Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio de cohortes2016Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumoFinanciación no declaradaSin ajuste declarado por estilo de vida

Meat, Fish, Poultry, and Egg Intake at Diagnosis and Risk of Prostate Cancer Progression

Wilson KM, Mucci LA, Drake BF, Preston MA, Stampfer MJ, Giovannucci E, Kibel AS

Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 15 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumoFinanciación no declaradaSin ajuste declarado por estilo de vida

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio de cohortes (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Consumo medido con
Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumo

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2016-09-21 · Cancer Prev Res (Phila) · vol. 9 · número 12 · págs. 933–941
Editorial
American Association for Cancer Research
Citado
24 citas · más que el 87% de estudios similares · 1.8× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
34 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (copia en repositorio) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Nutritional Studies and Diet · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Fatty Acid Research and Health
Palabras clave
Red meat, Prostate cancer, Medicine, Quartile, Cancer, Confidence interval, Internal medicine, Prospective cohort study, Lower risk, Pathology
MeSH
animals, poultry, fishes, humans, prostatic neoplasms, neoplasm recurrence, local, disease progression, neoplasm staging, prostatectomy, diet, logistic models, risk factors, cohort studies, prospective studies, eating, eggs, middle aged, male, neoplasm grading, surveys and questionnaires, red meat

7 autores

  • Kathryn M. Wilson🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaBrigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard University
  • Lorelei Ann Mucci🇺🇸Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard University
  • Bettina F. Drake🇺🇸Washington University in St. Louis
  • Mark A. Preston🇺🇸Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • Meir J. Stampfer🇺🇸Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard University
  • Edward L. Giovannucci🇺🇸Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard University
  • Adam Stuart Kibel🇺🇸Brigham and Women's Hospital

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Little information exists on diet and prostate cancer progression. We examined the association between intakes of total red meat, processed and unprocessed red meat, poultry, fish, and eggs and prostate cancer recurrence. We conducted a prospective study of 971 men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer between 2003 and 2010. Men completed a food frequency questionnaire at diagnosis. We used logistic regression to study the association between diet and high-grade or advanced-stage disease. We used Cox models to study the risk of progression [N = 94 events, mainly prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence]. Total red meat intake was marginally associated with risk of high-grade disease [Gleason ≥ 4+3; adjusted OR top vs. bottom quartile: 1.66; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.93-2.97; Ptrend = 0.05], as was very high intake of eggs (OR top decile vs. bottom quartile: 1.98; 95% CI, 1.08-3.63, Ptrend = 0.08). Well-done red meat was associated with advanced disease (≥pT3; OR top vs. bottom quartile: 1.74, 95% CI, 1.05-2.90; Ptrend = 0.01). Intakes of red meat, fish, and eggs were not associated with progression. Very high poultry intake was inversely associated with progression (HR top decile vs. bottom quartile: 0.19; 95% CI, 0.06-0.63; Ptrend = 0.02). Substituting 30 g/d of poultry or fish for total or unprocessed red meat was associated with significantly lower risk of recurrence. Lower intakes of red meat and well-done red meat and higher intakes of poultry and fish are associated with lower risk of high grade and advanced prostate cancer and reduced recurrence risk, independent of stage and grade. Cancer Prev Res; 9(12); 933-41. ©2016 AACR.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.