Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2016Financiación no declarada

Meta-analysis of Egg Consumption and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke

Alexander DD, Miller PE, Vargas AJ, Weed DL, Cohen SS

Journal of the American College of Nutrition · 82 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Consumo medido con
No se indica

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2016-10-06 · J Am Coll Nutr · vol. 35 · número 8 · págs. 704–716
Editorial
Taylor & Francis
Citado
141 citas · más que el 91% de estudios similares · 3.0× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
41 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Nutritional Studies and Diet · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Palabras clave
Medicine, Meta-analysis, Stroke (engine), Confidence interval, Relative risk, Prospective cohort study, Meta-regression, Internal medicine, Cohort study, Dietary Cholesterol, Lower risk, Cholesterol
MeSH
humans, coronary disease, cholesterol, dietary, diet, risk factors, eggs, adolescent, adult, aged, aged, 80 and over, middle aged, female, male, stroke

5 autores

  • Dominik D. Alexander🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaMichigan United
  • Paula E. Miller🇺🇸Michigan United
  • Ashley J. Vargas🇺🇸Michigan United
  • Douglas L. Weed
  • Sarah S. Cohen🇺🇸Michigan United

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

The possible relationship between dietary cholesterol and cardiac outcomes has been scrutinized for decades. However, recent reviews of the literature have suggested that dietary cholesterol is not a nutrient of concern. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis of egg intake (a significant contributor to dietary cholesterol) and risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke. A comprehensive literature search was conducted through August 2015 to identify prospective cohort studies that reported risk estimates for egg consumption in association with CHD or stroke. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to generate summary relative risk estimates (SRREs) for high vs low intake and stratified intake dose-response analyses. Heterogeneity was examined in subgroups where sensitivity and meta regression analyses were conducted based on increasing egg intake. A 12% decreased risk (SRRE = 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-0.97) of stroke was observed in the meta-analysis of 7 studies of egg intake (high vs low; generally 1/d vs 2 = 7.50). A nonstatistically significant SRRE of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.88-1.07, p-H = 0.67, I2 = 0.00) was observed in the meta-analysis of 7 studies of egg consumption and CHD. No clear dose-response trends were apparent in the stratified intake meta-analyses or the meta regression analyses. Based on the results of this meta-analysis, consumption of up to one egg daily may contribute to a decreased risk of total stroke, and daily egg intake does not appear to be associated with risk of CHD. Key Teaching Points: • The role of egg consumption in the risk of stroke and coronary heart disease has come under scrutiny over many years. • A comprehensive meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies that reported risk estimates for egg consumption in association with CHD or stroke was performed on the peer-reviewed epidemiologic literature through August 2015. • Overall, summary associations indicate that intake of up to 1 egg daily may be associated with reduced risk of total stroke. • Overall, summary associations show no clear association between egg intake and increased or decreased risk of CHD. • Eggs are a relatively low-cost and nutrient-dense whole food that provides a valuable source of protein, essential fatty acids, antioxidants, choline, vitamins, and minerals.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.