Financiado en parte por Cereal Partners Worldwide
Providing evidence to support the development of whole grain dietary recommendations in the United Kingdom
Mann KD, Pearce MS, Seal CJ
The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society · 15 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiado por la industriaSin ajuste declarado por estilo de vidaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Estudio transversal (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
- Consumo medido con
- Diarios o recordatorios de alimentación
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiado por la industria
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- British Nutrition Foundation
- Universidad u hospital
- University College London
- Empresa
- Cereal Partners Worldwide
- Gobierno
- Medical Research Council
Según 4 financiadores declarados.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2016-10-21 · Proc Nutr Soc · vol. 76 · número 3 · págs. 369–377
- Editorial
- Cambridge University Press
- Citado
- 22 citas · más que el 87% de estudios similares · 2.3× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 59 trabajos
- Acceso
- Lectura gratuita
- Áreas de investigación
- Food composition and properties · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Palabras clave
- Medicine, Environmental health, Observational study, Obesity, Whole grains, Food intake, Public health, Gerontology, Biology, Pathology, Food science, Internal medicine
- MeSH
- humans, chronic disease, risk, dietetics, evidence-based medicine, biomedical research, adult, child, health promotion, societies, scientific, nutritional sciences, congresses as topic, randomized controlled trials as topic, child nutritional physiological phenomena, observational studies as topic, whole grains, united kingdom, diet, healthy
3 autores
- Kay D. Mann🇬🇧 · autor de correspondenciaNIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre; Newcastle University
- Mark Stephen Pearce🇬🇧Newcastle University
- Chris J. Seal🇬🇧NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre; Newcastle University
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Observational evidence suggests that increased whole grain (WG) intake reduces the risks of many non-communicable diseases, such as CVD, type 2 diabetes, obesity and certain cancers. More recently, studies have shown that WG intake lowers all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Much of the reported evidence on risk reduction is from US and Scandinavian populations, where there are tangible WG dietary recommendations. At present there is no quantity-specific WG dietary recommendation in the UK, instead we are advised to choose WG or higher fibre versions. Despite recognition of WG as an important component of a healthy diet, monitoring of WG intake in the UK has been poor, with the latest intake assessment from data collected in 2000-2001 for adults and in 1997 for children. To update this information we examined WG intake in the National Diet and Nutrition Survey rolling programme 2008-2011 after developing our database of WG food composition, a key resource in determining WG intake accurately. The results showed median WG intakes remain low in both adults and children and below that of countries with quantity-specific guidance. We also found a reduction in C-reactive protein concentrations and leucocyte counts with increased WG intake, although no association with other markers of cardio-metabolic health. The recent recommendations by the UK Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition to increase dietary fibre intake will require a greater emphasis on consuming more WG. Specific recommendations on WG intake in the UK are warranted as is the development of public health policy to promote consumption of these important foods.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.