Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio de cohortes2016Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumo

Consumption of Unprocessed and Processed Red Meat and the Risk of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study of Men

Kaluza J, Larsson SC, Linden A, Wolk A

American journal of epidemiology · 30 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumo

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio de cohortes (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Consumo medido con
Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumo

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Universidad u hospital
Karolinska Institutet
Gobierno
Stockholms Läns Landsting
Gobierno
Vetenskapsrådet
Universidad u hospital
Szkola Glówna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie

Según 4 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2016-10-27 · Am J Epidemiol · vol. 184 · número 11 · págs. 829–836
Editorial
Oxford University Press
Citado
38 citas · más que el 93% de estudios similares · 3.5× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
34 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Nutritional Studies and Diet · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Palabras clave
COPD, Medicine, Hazard ratio, Red meat, Prospective cohort study, Confidence interval, Cohort study, Cohort, Population, Internal medicine, Environmental health, Pathology
MeSH
humans, pulmonary disease, chronic obstructive, hypertension, body weight, exercise, diet, incidence, proportional hazards models, risk factors, prospective studies, alcohol drinking, smoking, socioeconomic factors, meat products, aged, middle aged, sweden, male, red meat

4 autores

  • Joanna Kałuża🇵🇱 · autor de correspondenciaWarsaw University of Life Sciences
  • Susanna C. Larsson🇵🇱Warsaw University of Life Sciences
  • Anders Lindén🇵🇱Warsaw University of Life Sciences
  • Alicja Wolk🇵🇱Warsaw University of Life Sciences

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Consumption of both processed and unprocessed red meat has been associated with a higher risk of major chronic diseases. However, only processed meat consumption has been studied in relation to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Therefore, we endeavored to determine the association between the risk of COPD and consumption of processed and unprocessed red meat while taking into account smoking status. The population-based prospective Cohort of Swedish Men included 43,848 men who were 45-79 years of age and had no history of COPD or cancer at baseline. Meat consumption was assessed using a self-administered questionnaire in 1997. During 13.2 years of follow-up, 1,909 COPD cases were ascertained. Consumption of processed meat was associated with risk of COPD: Compared with men who consumed less than 25 g/day of processed meat, men who consumed 75 g/day or more had a multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio of 1.21 (95% confidence interval: 1.02, 1.44; P for trend = 0.03). The positive association was confined to current smokers (P for interaction = 0.003); among smokers who consumed 75 g/day or more of processed red meat, the hazard ratio was 1.26 (95% confidence interval: 1.00, 1.60) when compared with persons who consumed less than 25 g/day. Consumption of unprocessed red meat was not associated with COPD incidence. Findings from this prospective study indicate that high consumption of processed red meat is associated with an increased COPD risk among smokers.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.