Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2017Financiación no declarada

Does photobiomodulation therapy is better than cryotherapy in muscle recovery after a high-intensity exercise? A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial

De Marchi T, Schmitt VM, Machado GP, de Sene JS, de Col CD, Tairova O, Salvador M, Leal-Junior EC

Lasers in medical science · 31 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2017-01-05 · Lasers Med Sci · vol. 32 · número 2 · págs. 429–437
Editorial
Springer Science+Business Media
Citado
53 citas · más que el 96% de estudios similares · 5.7× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
53 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Exercise and Physiological Responses · Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Infrared Thermography in Medicine
Palabras clave
low-level laser therapy, cryotherapy, muscle recovery, high-intensity exercise, muscle fatigue, oxidative stress, creatine kinase, TBARS, protein carbonyls, muscle damage, combination therapy
MeSH
muscle, skeletal, humans, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, creatine kinase, proteins, placebos, exercise, cryotherapy, double-blind method, oxidation-reduction, lipid peroxidation, muscle fatigue, muscle contraction, adult, male, protein carbonylation, young adult, low-level light therapy

8 autores

  • Thiago De Marchi🇧🇷 · autor de correspondenciaUniversidade de Caxias do Sul
  • Vinícius Mazzochi Schmitt🇧🇷Universidade de Caxias do Sul
  • Guilherme Pinheiro Machado🇧🇷Universidade de Caxias do Sul
  • Juliane Souza de Sene🇧🇷Universidade de Caxias do Sul
  • Camila Dallavechia de Col🇧🇷Universidade de Caxias do Sul
  • Olga Sergueevna Tairova🇧🇷Universidade de Caxias do Sul
  • Mirian Mendonça Salvador🇧🇷Universidade de Caxias do Sul
  • Ernesto César Pinto Leal‐Junior🇧🇷Universidade Nove de Julho

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) and cryotherapy, in isolated and combined forms, as muscle recovery techniques after muscle fatigue-inducing protocol. Forty volunteers were randomly divided into five groups: a placebo group (PG); a PBMT group (PBMT); a cryotherapy group (CG); a cryotherapy-PBMT group (CPG); and a PBMT-cryotherapy group (PCG). All subjects performed four sessions at 24-h intervals, during which they submitted to isometric assessment (MVC) and blood collection in the pre-exercise period, and 5 and 60 min post-exercise, while the muscle fatigue induction protocol occurred after the pre-exercise collections. In the remaining sessions performed 24, 48, and 72 h later, only blood collections and MVCs were performed. A single treatment with PBMT and/or cryotherapy was applied after only 2 min of completing the post-5-min MVC test at the first session. In the intragroup comparison, it was found that exercise led to a significant decrease (p < 0.05) in the production of MVC in all groups. Comparing the results of MVCs between groups, we observed significant increases in the MVC capacity of the PBMT, CPG, and PCG volunteers in comparison with both PG and CG (p < 0.05). We observed a significant decrease in the concentrations of the biochemical markers of oxidative damage (TBARS and PC) in all groups and muscle damage (creatine kinase-CK) in the PBMT, PCG, and CPG compared with the PG (p < 0.01). The clinical impact of these findings is clear because they demonstrate that the use of phototherapy is more effective than the use of cryotherapy for muscle recovery, additionally cryotherapy decreases PBMT efficacy.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.