Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2017Financiación no declaradaAcceso abierto

Vitamin D deficiency and the risk of tuberculosis: a meta-analysis

Huang SJ, Wang XH, Liu ZD, Cao WL, Han Y, Ma AG, Xu SF

Drug design, development and therapy · 114 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2016-12-01 · Drug Des Devel Ther · vol. Volume11 · págs. 91–102
Editorial
Dove Medical Press
Citado
171 citas · más que el 95% de estudios similares · 3.6× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
53 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY-NC
Áreas de investigación
Vitamin D Research Studies · Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology · Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
Palabras clave
vitamin D deficiency, tuberculosis, tuberculosis risk factors, latent tuberculosis infection, tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome, HIV/TB coinfection, antiretroviral therapy, tuberculin skin test conversion, vitamin D supplementation, African populations
MeSH
humans, tuberculosis, hiv infections, vitamin d deficiency, antitubercular agents, anti-retroviral agents, risk factors

7 autores

  • Shao-Jun Huang🇨🇳Capital Medical University; Beijing Chest Hospital
  • Xianhua Wang🇨🇳Qingdao University
  • Zhidong Liu🇨🇳Capital Medical University; Beijing Chest Hospital
  • Wen-Li Cao🇨🇳Beijing Geriatric Hospital
  • Yi Han🇨🇳Capital Medical University; Beijing Chest Hospital
  • Aiguo Ma🇨🇳Qingdao University
  • Shaofa Xu🇨🇳Capital Medical University; Beijing Chest Hospital

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background and aim

To conduct meta-analyses of all published studies on various aspects of association between vitamin D and tuberculosis (TB).

Methods

PubMed and Web of Knowledge were searched for all properly controlled studies on vitamin D and TB. Pooled odds ratio, mean difference or standardized mean difference, and its corresponding 95% confidence interval were calculated with the Cochrane Review Manager 5.3.

Results

A significantly lower vitamin D level was found in TB patients vs controls; vitamin D deficiency (VDD) was associated with an increased risk of TB, although such an association was lacking in the African population and in the human immunodeficiency virus-infected African population. A significantly lower vitamin D level was found in human immunodeficiency virus-TB-coinfected African patients receiving antiretroviral treatment who developed TB-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome vs those who did not develop TB-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. VDD was associated with an increased risk of developing active TB in those subjects with latent TB infection and with an increased risk of tuberculin skin test conversion/TB infection conversion, and the trend toward a lower vitamin D level in active TB patients vs latent TB infection subjects did not reach statistical significance, indicating that VDD was more likely a risk factor than a consequence of TB. This concept was further strengthened by our result that anti-TB treatment did not affect vitamin D level in TB patients receiving the treatment.

Conclusion

Our analyses revealed an association between vitamin D and TB. VDD is more likely a risk factor for TB than its consequence. More studies are needed to determine whether vitamin D supplementation is beneficial to TB prevention and treatment.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY-NC).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.