Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Revisión sistemática2017Financiación no declaradaMezcla carne procesada con no procesada

Association between red meat consumption and colon cancer: A systematic review of experimental results

Turner ND, Lloyd SK

Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 78 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declaradaMezcla carne procesada con no procesada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas, más trabajo en animales o laboratorio
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2017-02-16 · Exp Biol Med (Maywood) · vol. 242 · número 8 · págs. 813–839
Editorial
SAGE Publishing
Citado
140 citas · más que el 91% de estudios similares · 2.8× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
85 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (copia en repositorio)
Áreas de investigación
Nutritional Studies and Diet · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress
Palabras clave
Red meat, Colorectal cancer, Cancer, Observational study, Consumption (sociology), Food science, Medicine, Biology, Environmental health, Biotechnology, Pathology, Internal medicine
MeSH
animals, humans, colonic neoplasms, iron, heme, mutagens, meat, cooking, diet, western, observational studies as topic

2 autores

  • Nancy D. Turner🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaTexas A&M University
  • Shannon K. Lloyd🇺🇸Texas A&M University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

A role for red and processed meat in the development of colorectal cancer has been proposed based largely on evidence from observational studies in humans, especially in those populations consuming a westernized diet. Determination of causation specifically by red or processed meat is contingent upon identification of plausible mechanisms that lead to colorectal cancer. We conducted a systematic review of the available evidence to determine the availability of plausible mechanistic data linking red and processed meat consumption to colorectal cancer risk. Forty studies using animal models or cell cultures met specified inclusion criteria, most of which were designed to examine the role of heme iron or heterocyclic amines in relation to colon carcinogenesis. Most studies used levels of meat or meat components well in excess of those found in human diets. Although many of the experiments used semi-purified diets designed to mimic the nutrient loads in current westernized diets, most did not include potential biologically active protective compounds present in whole foods. Because of these limitations in the existing literature, there is currently insufficient evidence to confirm a mechanistic link between the intake of red meat as part of a healthy dietary pattern and colorectal cancer risk. Impact statement Current recommendations to reduce colon cancer include the reduction or elimination of red or processed meats. These recommendations are based on data from epidemiological studies conducted among cultures where meat consumption is elevated and consumption of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains are reduced. This review evaluated experimental data exploring the putative mechanisms whereby red or processed meats may contribute to colon cancer. Most studies used levels of meat or meat-derived compounds that were in excess of those in human diets, even in cultures where meat intake is elevated. Experiments where protective dietary compounds were used to mitigate the extreme levels of meat and meat-derived compounds showed protection against colon cancer, with some essentially negating the impact of meat in the diet. It is essential that better-designed studies be conducted that use relevant concentrations of meat or meat-derived compounds in complex diets representative of the foods consumed by humans.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.