Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio de cohortes2017Sin ajuste declarado por estilo de vida

Association Between Dietary Factors and Mortality From Heart Disease, Stroke, and Type 2 Diabetes in the United States

Micha R, Peñalvo JL, Cudhea F, Imamura F, Rehm CD, Mozaffarian D

JAMA · 844 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Sin ajuste declarado por estilo de vida

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio de cohortes (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Consumo medido con
Diarios o recordatorios de alimentación

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
Medical Research Council
Gobierno
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Gobierno
NHLBI NIH HHS
Subvenciones
Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12015/5); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL130735); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL115189)

Según 3 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2017-03-07 · JAMA · vol. 317 · número 9 · pág. 912
Editorial
American Medical Association
Citado
1,244 citas · más que el 100% de estudios similares · 100.7× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
30 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (copia en repositorio)
Áreas de investigación
Nutritional Studies and Diet · Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors · Sodium Intake and Health
Palabras clave
Medicine, Type 2 diabetes, Stroke (engine), Diabetes mellitus, Population, Disease, Environmental health, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, Internal medicine, Endocrinology
MeSH
humans, fruit, nuts, vegetables, heart diseases, diabetes mellitus, type 2, sodium, dietary, nutrition surveys, risk assessment, uncertainty, prospective studies, feeding behavior, energy intake, meat, seafood, adult, aged, middle aged, female, male, clinical trials as topic, meta-analysis as topic, stroke

6 autores

  • Renata Micha🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaTufts University
  • José Luis Peñalvo🇺🇸Tufts University
  • Frederick Cudhea🇺🇸Tufts University
  • Fumiaki Imamura🇬🇧University of Cambridge; MRC Epidemiology Unit
  • Colin D. Rehm🇺🇸Montefiore Medical Center
  • Dariush Mozaffarian🇺🇸Tufts University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Importance

In the United States, national associations of individual dietary factors with specific cardiometabolic diseases are not well established.

Objective

To estimate associations of intake of 10 specific dietary factors with mortality due to heart disease, stroke, and type 2 diabetes (cardiometabolic mortality) among US adults.

Design, setting, and participants

A comparative risk assessment model incorporated data and corresponding uncertainty on population demographics and dietary habits from National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (1999-2002: n = 8104; 2009-2012: n = 8516); estimated associations of diet and disease from meta-analyses of prospective studies and clinical trials with validity analyses to assess potential bias; and estimated disease-specific national mortality from the National Center for Health Statistics.

Exposures

Consumption of 10 foods/nutrients associated with cardiometabolic diseases: fruits, vegetables, nuts/seeds, whole grains, unprocessed red meats, processed meats, sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), polyunsaturated fats, seafood omega-3 fats, and sodium.

Main outcomes and measures

Estimated absolute and percentage mortality due to heart disease, stroke, and type 2 diabetes in 2012. Disease-specific and demographic-specific (age, sex, race, and education) mortality and trends between 2002 and 2012 were also evaluated.

Results

In 2012, 702 308 cardiometabolic deaths occurred in US adults, including 506 100 from heart disease (371 266 coronary heart disease, 35 019 hypertensive heart disease, and 99 815 other cardiovascular disease), 128 294 from stroke (16 125 ischemic, 32 591 hemorrhagic, and 79 578 other), and 67 914 from type 2 diabetes. Of these, an estimated 318 656 (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 306 064-329 755; 45.4%) cardiometabolic deaths per year were associated with suboptimal intakes-48.6% (95% UI, 46.2%-50.9%) of cardiometabolic deaths in men and 41.8% (95% UI, 39.3%-44.2%) in women; 64.2% (95% UI, 60.6%-67.9%) at younger ages (25-34 years) and 35.7% (95% UI, 33.1%-38.1%) at older ages (≥75 years); 53.1% (95% UI, 51.6%-54.8%) among blacks, 50.0% (95% UI, 48.2%-51.8%) among Hispanics, and 42.8% (95% UI, 40.9%-44.5%) among whites; and 46.8% (95% UI, 44.9%-48.7%) among lower-, 45.7% (95% UI, 44.2%-47.4%) among medium-, and 39.1% (95% UI, 37.2%-41.2%) among higher-educated individuals. The largest numbers of estimated diet-related cardiometabolic deaths were related to high sodium (66 508 deaths in 2012; 9.5% of all cardiometabolic deaths), low nuts/seeds (59 374; 8.5%), high processed meats (57 766; 8.2%), low seafood omega-3 fats (54 626; 7.8%), low vegetables (53 410; 7.6%), low fruits (52 547; 7.5%), and high SSBs (51 694; 7.4%). Between 2002 and 2012, population-adjusted US cardiometabolic deaths per year decreased by 26.5%. The greatest decline was associated with insufficient polyunsaturated fats (-20.8% relative change [95% UI, -18.5% to -22.8%]), nuts/seeds (-18.0% [95% UI, -14.6% to -21.0%]), and excess SSBs (-14.5% [95% UI, -12.0% to -16.9%]). The greatest increase was associated with unprocessed red meats (+14.4% [95% UI, 9.1%-19.5%]).

Conclusions and relevance

Dietary factors were estimated to be associated with a substantial proportion of deaths from heart disease, stroke, and type 2 diabetes. These results should help identify priorities, guide public health planning, and inform strategies to alter dietary habits and improve health.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.