Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Revisión sistemática2017Financiación no declarada

The effectiveness of low-level laser therapy on pain, self-reported hand function, and grip strength compared to placebo or "sham" treatment for adults with carpal tunnel syndrome: A systematic review

Burger M, Kriel R, Damon A, Abel A, Bansda A, Wakens M, Ernstzen D

Physiotherapy theory and practice · 20 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2017-03-04 · Physiother Theory Pract · vol. 33 · número 3 · págs. 184–197
Editorial
Taylor & Francis
Citado
30 citas · más que el 43% de estudios similares · 0.4× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
31 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Peripheral Nerve Disorders · Pain Management and Treatment
Palabras clave
carpal tunnel syndrome, low-level laser therapy, pain, hand function, grip strength, placebo, sham treatment, peripheral neuropathy, physiotherapy
MeSH
hand, humans, carpal tunnel syndrome, pain measurement, hand strength, treatment outcome, placebo effect, recovery of function, research design, adult, middle aged, female, male, randomized controlled trials as topic, low-level light therapy

7 autores

  • Marlette Burger🇿🇦 · autor de correspondenciaStellenbosch University
  • Réna Isabel Kriel🇿🇦Stellenbosch University
  • Andrea Damon
  • Amy Abel
  • Anisha Bansda
  • Marinique Wakens
  • Dawn Verna Ernstzen🇿🇦Stellenbosch University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is one of the most common peripheral neuropathies in the upper extremity.

Objective

The aim of this review was to systematically and critically appraise the available literature for the effectiveness of Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) on pain, self-reported hand function, and grip strength compared to placebo treatment in adults with CTS.

Methodology

Seven databases were searched from 2000 to March 2015 namely: Cinahl, Cochrane Library, EBSCOhost, PEDro, PubMed, Science Direct, and Scopus. Key search terms were: CTS, LLLT, and physiotherapy. Specific inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. The methodological quality was appraised with the PEDro scale. Data were extracted and captured on an Excel spreadsheet.

Results

The nine included randomized control trials (RCTs) had an average score of 8.2/11 according to the PEDro scale. The heterogeneity of the LLLT regimes used made statistical pooling inappropriate for this review and results were described narratively.

Conclusion

No strong evidence exists concerning the effects of LLLT on CTS in adults. Studies that used 780-860 nm Lasers and energy dosages of 9-11 J/cm2 or 10.8 J reported a more favorable outcome for pain, symptom severity, and functional ability as well as grip strength at the end of treatment and short-term follow up.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.