Food groups and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies
Schwingshackl L, Hoffmann G, Lampousi AM, Knüppel S, Iqbal K, Schwedhelm C, Bechthold A, Schlesinger S, Boeing H
European journal of epidemiology · 576 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
- Consumo medido con
- No se indica
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2017-04-10 · Eur J Epidemiol · vol. 32 · número 5 · págs. 363–375
- Editorial
- Springer Science+Business Media
- Citado
- 820 citas · más que el 99% de estudios similares · 11.0× el promedio de su campo
- Impacto
- Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
- Referencias
- 56 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY
- Áreas de investigación
- Nutritional Studies and Diet · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
- Palabras clave
- Refined grains, Medicine, Meta-analysis, Type 2 diabetes, Red meat, Relative risk, Food group, Environmental health, Food science, Whole grains, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Risk assessment, Prospective cohort study, Diabetes mellitus, Confidence interval, Internal medicine, Biology, Pathology, Endocrinology
- MeSH
- humans, fruit, nuts, vegetables, diabetes mellitus, type 2, diet, risk factors, prospective studies, feeding behavior, risk reduction behavior, eating, food, meat, whole grains
9 autores
- Lukas Schwingshackl🇩🇪 · autor de correspondenciaGerman Institute of Human Nutrition
- Georg E. HOFFMANN🇦🇹University of Vienna
- Anna‐Maria Lampousi🇩🇪German Institute of Human Nutrition
- Sven Knüppel🇩🇪German Institute of Human Nutrition
- Khalid Javed Iqbal🇩🇪German Institute of Human Nutrition
- Carolina Schwedhelm🇩🇪German Institute of Human Nutrition
- Angela Bechthold
- Sabrina Schlesinger🇬🇧🇩🇪St Mary's Hospital; Deutsches Diabetes-Zentrum e.V.; Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf; Imperial College London
- Heiner Boeing🇩🇪German Institute of Human Nutrition
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesize the knowledge about the relation between intake of 12 major food groups and risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Medline (Ovid), Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar for prospective studies investigating the association between whole grains, refined grains, vegetables, fruits, nuts, legumes, eggs, dairy, fish, red meat, processed meat, and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) on risk of T2D. Summary relative risks were estimated using a random effects model by contrasting categories, and for linear and non-linear dose-response relationships. Six out of the 12 food-groups showed a significant relation with risk of T2D, three of them a decrease of risk with increasing consumption (whole grains, fruits, and dairy), and three an increase of risk with increasing consumption (red meat, processed meat, and SSB) in the linear dose-response meta-analysis. There was evidence of a non-linear relationship between fruits, vegetables, processed meat, whole grains, and SSB and T2D risk. Optimal consumption of risk-decreasing foods resulted in a 42% reduction, and consumption of risk-increasing foods was associated with a threefold T2D risk, compared to non-consumption. The meta-evidence was graded "low" for legumes and nuts; "moderate" for refined grains, vegetables, fruit, eggs, dairy, and fish; and "high" for processed meat, red meat, whole grains, and SSB. Among the investigated food groups, selecting specific optimal intakes can lead to a considerable change in risk of T2D.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.