Caffeine intake and Menière's disease: Is there relationship?
Sánchez-Sellero I, San-Román-Rodríguez E, Santos-Pérez S, Rossi-Izquierdo M, Soto-Varela A
Nutritional neuroscience · 18 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Estudio de casos y controles (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2017-05-19 · Nutr Neurosci · vol. 21 · número 9 · págs. 624–631
- Editorial
- Taylor & Francis
- Citado
- 29 citas · más que el 84% de estudios similares · 1.7× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 18 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Vestibular and auditory disorders · Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies · Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
- Palabras clave
- Caffeine, Medicine, Meniere's disease, Observational study, Vertigo, Disease, Cross-sectional study, Internal medicine, Physiology, Surgery, Pathology
- MeSH
- humans, vertigo, caffeine, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, dose-response relationship, drug, coffee, tea, adult, aged, aged, 80 and over, middle aged, female, male, meniere disease, young adult
5 autores
- Inés Sánchez‐Sellero🇪🇸Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
- Elena San-Román-Rodríguez🇪🇸Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña; Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti
- Sofía Santos-Pérez🇪🇸Universidade de Santiago de Compostela; Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago; Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña
- Marcos Rossi-Izquierdo🇪🇸Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña; Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti
- Andrés Soto-Varela🇪🇸 · autor de correspondenciaUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela; Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago; Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Objectives
Although it is commonly recognized that dietary restrictions may improve the clinical course of Menière's disease, their effectiveness has not been definitely demonstrated. The aim of this study was to examine whether caffeine consumption could be involved in Menière's disease.
Methods
Cross-sectional, observational, case-control study, comparing caffeine consumption (intake of coffee, tea, kola-type beverages, energy drinks, and chocolate-containing beverages or foods) between patients with Menière's disease (group A) and patients affected by vertigo with other origins (group B) and/or control subjects (group C).
Patients
180 subjects (72 in group A, 72 in group B, and 36 in group C). Caffeine intake was categorized in four levels: very low (0-25 mg/day), low (26-100 mg/day), moderate (101-300 mg/day), and high (≥301 mg/day). Very low and low intake were considered light consumption, and moderate and high intake, heavy consumption.
Results
Mean daily caffeine intake was 175.8 mg. Menière's disease patients showed a daily caffeine intake (222 mg) greater than those not affected by this disease (145 mg). Excluding in group B migraine patients, differences in caffeine intake are significant among the three groups (P = 0.021). There were significantly more heavy-consumers in group A than in other two groups jointed (P = 0.024; OR = 1.301, IC95% (1.015;1.668)). In group A, the age at onset of symptoms in caffeine consumers (49.7 years) was lower than in non-consumers (55.9 years).
Discussion
It should be recommended to reduce caffeine intake in those population groups with higher risk of Menière's disease (e.g. subjects with family members suffering from this disease).
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.