Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2017Acceso abierto

Music interventions to reduce stress and anxiety in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Corbijn van Willenswaard K, Lynn F, McNeill J, McQueen K, Dennis CL, Lobel M, Alderdice F

BMC psychiatry · 69 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Universidad u hospital
Queen's University Belfast
Universidad u hospital
Queen's University
Universidad u hospital
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast

Según 3 financiadores declarados y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2017-07-27 · BMC Psychiatry · vol. 17 · número 1 · pág. 271
Editorial
BioMed Central
Citado
142 citas · más que el 80% de estudios similares · 1.6× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
44 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Music Therapy and Health · Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum · Infant Development and Preterm Care
Palabras clave
Anxiety, Blinding, Psychological intervention, Meta-analysis, Pregnancy, Medicine, Strictly standardized mean difference, Randomized controlled trial, Systematic review, Clinical psychology, Physical therapy, MEDLINE, Psychiatry, Internal medicine
MeSH
humans, pregnancy complications, treatment outcome, music therapy, stress, psychological, anxiety disorders, pregnancy, female

7 autores

  • Kyrsten Corbijn van Willenswaard🇬🇧Queen's University Belfast
  • Fiona Ann Lynn🇬🇧Queen's University Belfast
  • Jenny A. McNeill🇬🇧Queen's University Belfast
  • Karen McQueen🇨🇦Lakehead University
  • Cindy‐Lee Dennis🇨🇦University of Toronto
  • Marci Lobel🇺🇸Stony Brook University
  • Fiona A. Alderdice🇬🇧 · autor de correspondenciaQueen's University Belfast; University of Oxford

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Stress and anxiety are common in pregnancy and shown to have adverse effects on maternal and infant health outcomes. The aim of this review and meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of music-based interventions in reducing levels of stress or anxiety among pregnant women.

Methods

Six databases were searched using key terms relating to pregnancy, psychological stress, anxiety and music. Inclusion criteria were randomised controlled or quasi-experimental trials that assessed the effect of music during pregnancy and measured levels of psychological stress or anxiety as a primary or secondary outcome. Two authors independently assessed and extracted data. Quality assessment was performed using The Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias criteria. Meta-analyses were conducted to assess stress and anxiety reduction following a music-based intervention compared to a control group that received routine antenatal care.

Results

Five studies with 1261 women were included. Music interventions significantly reduced levels of maternal anxiety (Standardised Mean Difference (SMD): -0.21; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) -0.39, -0.03; p = 0.02). There was no significant effect on general stress (SMD: -0.08; 95% CI -0.25, 0.09; p = 0.35) or pregnancy-specific stress (SMD: -0.02; 95% CI -0.19, 0.15; p = 0.80). The methodological quality of included studies was moderate to weak, all studies having a high or unclear risk of bias in allocation concealment, blinding and selective outcome reporting.

Conclusions

There is evidence that music-based interventions may reduce anxiety in pregnancy; however, the methodological quality of the studies was moderate to weak. Additional research is warranted focusing on rigour of assessment, intensity of interventions delivered and methodological limitations.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.