Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Revisión sistemática2018

A systematic review of vitamin D status in southern European countries

Manios Y, Moschonis G, Lambrinou CP, Tsoutsoulopoulou K, Binou P, Karachaliou A, Breidenassel C, Gonzalez-Gross M, Kiely M, Cashman KD

European journal of nutrition · 95 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
European Food Safety Authority
Gobierno
Seventh Framework Programme
Subvenciones
Seventh Framework Programme (613977)

Según 2 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2017-10-31 · Eur J Nutr · vol. 57 · número 6 · págs. 2001–2036
Editorial
Springer Science+Business Media
Citado
168 citas · más que el 90% de estudios similares · 2.2× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
150 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Vitamin D Research Studies · Nutrition and Health Studies · Skin Protection and Aging
Palabras clave
vitamin D status, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, vitamin D deficiency, Southern Europe, Eastern Mediterranean, sex differences, age groups, seasonal variation, vitamin D supplementation, food fortification
MeSH
humans, vitamin d deficiency, vitamin d, prevalence, seasons, nutritional status, adolescent, adult, aged, aged, 80 and over, middle aged, mediterranean region, female, male, young adult

10 autores

  • Yannis Μanios🇬🇷 · autor de correspondenciaHarokopio University of Athens
  • George Moschonis🇦🇺La Trobe University
  • Christina P. Lambrinou🇬🇷Harokopio University of Athens
  • Konstantina Tsoutsoulopoulou🇬🇷Harokopio University of Athens
  • Panagiota Binou🇬🇷Harokopio University of Athens
  • Alexandra Karachaliou🇬🇷Harokopio University of Athens
  • Christina Breidenassel🇪🇸Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
  • Marcela González‐Gross🇪🇸Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
  • Mairead E Kiely🇮🇪University College Cork
  • Kevin D. Cashman🇮🇪University College Cork

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Purpose

Despite an acknowledged dearth of data on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations from Southern European countries, inter-country comparison is hampered by inconsistent data reporting. The purpose of the current study was to conduct a systematic literature review of available data on serum 25(OH)D concentrations and estimate vitamin D status in Southern European and Eastern Mediterranean countries, both at a population level and within key population subgroups, stratified by age, sex, season and country.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify and retrieve scientific articles reporting data on serum 25(OH)D concentration and/or vitamin D status following standard procedures.

Results

Data were extracted from 107 studies, stratified by sex and age group, representing 630,093 individuals. More than one-third of the studies reported mean 25(OH)D concentrations below 50 nmol/L and ~ 10% reported mean serum 25(OH)D concentrations below 25 nmol/L. Overall, females, neonates/ infants and adolescents had the higher prevalence of poor vitamin D status. As expected, there was considerable variability between studies. Specifically, mean 25(OH)D ranged from 6.0 (in Italian centenarians) to 158 nmol/L (in elderly Turkish men); the prevalence of serum 25(OH)D < 50 nmol/L ranged from 6.8 to 97.9% (in Italian neonates).

Conclusions

Contrary to expectations, there was a high prevalence of low vitamin D status in the Southern Europe and the Eastern Mediterranean regions, despite abundant sunshine. These data further emphasize the need for strategies, such as fortification of foods with vitamin D and/or vitamin D supplementation, which will be tailored to the needs of specific population groups with higher risk of insufficiency or deficiency, to efficiently tackle the pandemic of hypovitaminosis D in Europe.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.