Music Listening and Stress in Daily Life-a Matter of Timing
Linnemann A, Wenzel M, Grammes J, Kubiak T, Nater UM
International journal of behavioral medicine · 18 citas
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Estudio de cohortes (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
- Universidad u hospital
- Universität Wien
- Universidad u hospital
- University of Vienna
Según 2 financiadores declarados y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2017-11-21 · Int J Behav Med · vol. 25 · número 2 · págs. 223–230
- Editorial
- Springer Science+Business Media
- Citado
- 59 citas · más que el 87% de estudios similares · 2.1× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 29 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY
- Áreas de investigación
- Music Therapy and Health · Neuroscience and Music Perception · Diverse Music Education Insights
- Palabras clave
- Active listening, Psychology, Stress (linguistics), Audiology, Appreciative listening, Music psychology, Cognitive psychology, Developmental psychology, Medicine, Music education, Communication
- MeSH
- humans, stress, psychological, music, adolescent, adult, female, male, young adult, self report
5 autores
- Alexandra Linnemann🇩🇪Philipps University of Marburg
- Mario Wenzel🇩🇪Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
- Jennifer Grammes🇩🇪Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
- Thomas Kubiak🇩🇪Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
- Urs Markus Nater🇦🇹🇩🇪 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Vienna; Philipps University of Marburg
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Purpose
Despite increasing evidence suggesting that music listening in daily life has stress-reducing effects, studies mostly rely on subjective, retrospective data on music listening. Thus, the temporal dynamics underlying the stress-reducing effect of music listening remain unclear. Therefore, we aimed to examine the temporal dynamics of the associations between stress and music listening by assessing subjective and objective data on music in daily life.
Design
An exploratory Ambulatory Assessment study examining a total of 60 participants (37 women), aged 18 to 34 years (M = 22.4 years, SD = 3.5) was conducted.
Methods
For 1 week, participants answered questions on music listening and stress six times per day via an electronic diary device, which additionally objectively sampled the exact time point of music listening and its duration.
Results
Self-reports on mere music listening were associated with lower stress reports, whereas objectively assessed data was not. However, concerning duration of music listening, both subjective and objective data on music listening showed associations between a minimum of 20 min of music listening and lower stress reports. Concerning the latency, objective data on music listening revealed that the association between stress reports and music listening occurs in a time-delayed manner.
Conclusions
Although the study design does not allow for causal inferences, substantial associations among subjectively and objectively assessed data on music listening were found to differentially affect the experience of stress after music listening. In particular, when focusing on the temporal dynamics, objectively assessed data allowed for a more fine-grained analysis. In consequence, subjectively and objectively reported data on music listening should be assessed jointly when investigating effects of music listening on health. Experimental research with rigorous methodological control is required in order to corroborate our findings in a laboratory setting.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.