Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2017

Caffeine effects on VO2max test outcomes investigated by a placebo perceived-as-caffeine design

Brietzke C, Asano RY, De Russi de Lima F, Pinheiro FA, Franco-Alvarenga, Ugrinowitsch C, Pires FO

Nutrition and health · 22 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Gobierno
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Gobierno
Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo
Subvenciones
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2010/01317-0)

Según 3 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2017-12-01 · Nutr Health · vol. 23 · número 4 · págs. 231–238
Editorial
SAGE Publishing
Citado
30 citas · más que el 70% de estudios similares · 0.8× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
49 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Muscle metabolism and nutrition · Cardiovascular and exercise physiology · Sports Performance and Training
Palabras clave
Caffeine, Placebo, Ingestion, Perceived exertion, Medicine, VO2 max, Internal medicine, Cycling, Endocrinology, Animal science, Cardiology, Physical therapy, Heart rate, Blood pressure, Biology
MeSH
leg, humans, fatigue, caffeine, central nervous system stimulants, severity of illness index, reproducibility of results, single-blind method, attitude to health, deception, oxygen consumption, time factors, bicycling, dietary supplements, adult, athletic performance, physical exertion, young adult, performance-enhancing substances, musculoskeletal pain

7 autores

  • Cayque Brietzke🇧🇷Universidade de São Paulo
  • Ricardo Yukio Asano🇧🇷Universidade de São Paulo
  • Felipe De Russi de Lima🇧🇷Universidade de São Paulo
  • Fabiano Aparecido Pinheiro🇧🇷Universidade de São Paulo
  • Paulo Estevão Franco‐Alvarenga🇧🇷Universidade de São Paulo
  • Carlos Ugrinowitsch🇧🇷Universidade de São Paulo
  • Flávio Oliveira Pires🇧🇷Universidade de São Paulo

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Ergogenic effects of caffeine (CAF) ingestion have been observed in different cycling exercise modes, and have been associated with alterations in ratings of perceived exertion (RPE). However, there has been little investigation of maximal oxygen uptake (VO2MAX) test outcomes.

Aim

This study aimed to verify whether CAF may reduce RPE, thereby improving maximal incremental test (MIT) outcomes such as VO2MAX, time to exhaustion and peak power output (WPEAK).

Methods

Nine healthy individuals performed three MITs (25 W/min until exhaustion) in a random, counterbalanced fashion after ingestion of CAF, placebo perceived as caffeine (PLA), and no supplementation (baseline control). VO2 was measured throughout the test, while RPE was rated according to overall and leg effort sensations. The power output corresponding to submaximal (RPE = 14 according to the 6-20 Borg scale) and maximal RPE was recorded for both overall (O-RPE14 and O-RPEMAX) and leg RPE (L-RPE14 and L-RPEMAX).

Results

VO2MAX did not change significantly between MITs; however, CAF and PLA increased time to exhaustion (↑ ∼18.7% and ∼17.1%, respectively; p PEAK (↑ ∼13.0% and ∼11.8%, respectively; p MAX and L-RPEMAX) than submaximal RPE (possibly beneficial in O-RPE14 and L-RPE14). Similar results were found when participants ingested PLA.

Conclusions

Compared with control, CAF and PLA improved MIT performance outcomes such as time to exhaustion and WPEAK, without altering VO2MAX values. CAF effects were attributed to placebo.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.