Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Revisión sistemática2018

Vitamin D and gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review based on data free of Hawthorne effect

Zhang Y, Gong Y, Xue H, Xiong J, Cheng G

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 90 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Universidad u hospital
Sichuan University
Subvenciones
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81472976)

Según 2 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2017-12-16 · BJOG · vol. 125 · número 7 · págs. 784–793
Editorial
Wiley
Citado
124 citas · más que el 94% de estudios similares · 3.1× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
31 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management · Vitamin D Research Studies · Birth, Development, and Health
Palabras clave
vitamin D, gestational diabetes mellitus, vitamin D deficiency, insulin resistance, fasting insulin, fasting blood glucose, C-reactive protein, glutathione, serum lipids, Hawthorne effect
MeSH
humans, diabetes, gestational, insulin resistance, vitamin d deficiency, insulin, blood glucose, vitamin d, fasting, risk factors, pregnancy, pregnancy trimesters, dietary supplements, female, randomized controlled trials as topic, observational studies as topic

5 autores

  • Yanbo Zhang🇨🇳Sichuan University; Huazhong University of Science and Technology
  • Yunhui Gong🇨🇳Sichuan University
  • Hongmei Xue🇨🇳Sichuan University
  • Jingyuan Xiong🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaSichuan University
  • Guo Cheng🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaSichuan University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an increasingly prevalent disorder, associated with low blood vitamin D level.

Objectives

To evaluate the relationship between vitamin D and GDM.

Search strategy

EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and China Biology Medicine disc were searched up to May 2017. The references of previous studies were screened.

Selection criteria

Observational studies on the relationship between vitamin D and GDM free from Hawthorne effect and randomised controlled trials of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy for preventing or treating GDM were included.

Data collection and analysis

Data and information of included articles were extracted by duplicate using piloted tables. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Handbook were used for quality assessment. Random-effects models were used for meta-analyses. Heterogeneity tests, sensitivity analysis and analysis of publication bias were conducted.

Main results

Eighty-seven observational studies and 25 randomised controlled trials involving 55 859 and 2445 women, respectively, were included. Low blood vitamin D level during pregnancy was associated with a higher risk of GDM (OR 1.850, 95% CI 1.471-2.328). Blood vitamin D level for women with GDM were lower than in the control women. Blood vitamin D level was associated with fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and homeostasis model of assessment for insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) (r = -0.100 and r = -0.351), whereas the correlation between blood vitamin D level and fasting insulin (FINS) might be concealed by publication bias. Vitamin D intervention during pregnancy could change the blood levels of vitamin D, FINS, FPG, HOMA-IR, glutathione, C-reactive protein and lipid.

Conclusions

Low blood vitamin D level could increase the risk of GDM, and vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy could ameliorate the condition of GDM.

Tweetable abstract

Low blood vitamin D increases gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) risk. Vitamin D supplementation ameliorates GDM condition.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.