Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2017Financiado por la industriaVínculos de autores con la industriaAcceso abierto

Financiado en parte por Nutrabolt

Hematological and Hemodynamic Responses to Acute and Short-Term Creatine Nitrate Supplementation

Dalton RL, Sowinski RJ, Grubic TJ, Collins PB, Coletta AM, Reyes AG, Sanchez B, Koozehchian M, Jung YP, Rasmussen C, Greenwood M, Murano PS, Earnest CP, Kreider RB

Nutrients · 18 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Vínculos de autores con la industriaFinanciado por la industria

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiado por la industria
Empresa
Nutrabolt
Autores
Al menos un autor declara un vínculo económico con la industria

Según 1 financiador declarado y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2017-12-15 · Nutrients · vol. 9 · número 12 · pág. 1359
Editorial
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Citado
22 citas · más que el 62% de estudios similares · 0.5× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
75 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Muscle metabolism and nutrition · Sports Performance and Training · Biochemical effects in animals
Palabras clave
creatine supplementation, acute supplementation, short-term supplementation, hemodynamic response, blood markers, postural challenge, strength performance, bench press, leg press, cycling time trial, recovery performance, post-exercise recovery, adverse effects, dose comparison, sex differences, men and women
MeSH
muscle, skeletal, animals, humans, nitrates, creatine, anthropometry, treatment outcome, cross-over studies, double-blind method, body composition, physical endurance, dose-response relationship, drug, bicycling, dietary supplements, adolescent, adult, female, male, muscle strength, hemodynamics, athletic performance, young adult, performance-enhancing substances, surveys and questionnaires

14 autores

  • R Dalton🇺🇸Texas A&M University
  • Ryan J. Sowinski🇺🇸Texas A&M University
  • Tyler Grubic🇺🇸Texas A&M University
  • Patrick Collins🇺🇸Texas A&M University
  • Adriana M. Coletta🇺🇸Texas A&M University
  • A. Reyes🇺🇸Texas A&M University
  • B Sanchez🇺🇸Texas A&M University
  • M Koozehchian🇺🇸Texas A&M University
  • Yanghoon Peter Jung🇺🇸Texas A&M University
  • Christopher J. Rasmussen🇺🇸Texas A&M University
  • Mike Greenwood🇺🇸Texas A&M University
  • Peter S. Murano🇺🇸Texas A&M University
  • Conrad P. Earnest🇺🇸Texas A&M University
  • Richard B. Kreider🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaTexas A&M University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

In a double-blind, crossover, randomized and placebo-controlled trial; 28 men and women ingested a placebo (PLA), 3 g of creatine nitrate (CNL), and 6 g of creatine nitrate (CNH) for 6 days. Participants repeated the experiment with the alternate supplements after a 7-day washout. Hemodynamic responses to a postural challenge, fasting blood samples, and bench press, leg press, and cycling time trial performance and recovery were assessed. Data were analyzed by univariate, multivariate, and repeated measures general linear models (GLM). No significant differences were found among treatments for hemodynamic responses, clinical blood markers or self-reported side effects. After 5 days of supplementation, one repetition maximum (1RM) bench press improved significantly for CNH (mean change, 95% CI; 6.1 [3.5, 8.7] kg) but not PLA (0.7 [-1.6, 3.0] kg or CNL (2.0 [-0.9, 4.9] kg, CNH, p = 0.01). CNH participants also tended to experience an attenuated loss in 1RM strength during the recovery performance tests following supplementation on day 5 (PLA: -9.3 [-13.5, -5.0], CNL: -9.3 [-13.5, -5.1], CNH: -3.9 [-6.6, -1.2] kg, p = 0.07). After 5 days, pre-supplementation 1RM leg press values increased significantly, only with CNH (24.7 [8.8, 40.6] kg, but not PLA (13.9 [-15.7, 43.5] or CNL (14.6 [-0.5, 29.7]). Further, post-supplementation 1RM leg press recovery did not decrease significantly for CNH (-13.3 [-31.9, 5.3], but did for PLA (-30.5 [-53.4, -7.7] and CNL (-29.0 [-49.5, -8.4]). CNL treatment promoted an increase in bench press repetitions at 70% of 1RM during recovery on day 5 (PLA: 0.4 [-0.8, 1.6], CNL: 0.9 [0.35, 1.5], CNH: 0.5 [-0.2, 0.3], p = 0.56), greater leg press endurance prior to supplementation on day 5 (PLA: -0.2 [-1.6, 1.2], CNL: 0.9 [0.2, 1.6], CNH: 0.2 [-0.5, 0.9], p = 0.25) and greater leg press endurance during recovery on day 5 (PLA: -0.03 [-1.2, 1.1], CNL: 1.1 [0.3, 1.9], CNH: 0.4 [-0.4, 1.2], p = 0.23). Cycling time trial performance (4 km) was not affected. Results indicate that creatine nitrate supplementation, up to a 6 g dose, for 6 days, appears to be safe and provide some ergogenic benefit.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.