Core Temperature Responses to Cold-Water Immersion Recovery: A Pooled-Data Analysis
Stephens JM, Sharpe K, Gore C, Miller J, Slater GJ, Versey N, Peiffer J, Duffield R, Minett GM, Crampton D, Dunne A, Askew CD, Halson SL
International journal of sports physiology and performance · 11 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2017-12-28 · Int J Sports Physiol Perform · vol. 13 · número 7 · págs. 917–925
- Editorial
- Human Kinetics
- Citado
- 15 citas · más que el 80% de estudios similares · 1.3× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 36 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (copia en repositorio)
- Áreas de investigación
- Exercise and Physiological Responses · Thermoregulation and physiological responses · Sports injuries and prevention
- Palabras clave
- Immersion (mathematics), Core temperature, Medicine, Mean difference, Internal medicine, Confidence interval, Mathematics
- MeSH
- humans, water, exercise, immersion, body temperature regulation, muscle fatigue, time factors, adult, male, cold temperature, young adult, myalgia
13 autores
- Jessica Stephens🇦🇺 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of the Sunshine Coast
- Ken Sharpe🇦🇺The University of Melbourne
- Christopher J. Gore🇦🇺University of Canberra
- Joanna Miller
- Gary J. Slater🇦🇺University of the Sunshine Coast
- Nathan G. Versey
- Jeremiah J. Peiffer🇦🇺Murdoch University
- Rob Duffield🇦🇺University of Technology Sydney
- Geoffrey M. Minett🇦🇺Queensland University of Technology
- David Crampton🇮🇪Trinity College Dublin
- Alan Dunne🇮🇪Trinity College Dublin
- Christopher David Askew🇦🇺University of the Sunshine Coast
- Shona Leigh Halson
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Purpose
To examine the effect of postexercise cold-water immersion (CWI) protocols, compared with control (CON), on the magnitude and time course of core temperature (Tc) responses.
Methods
Pooled-data analyses were used to examine the Tc responses of 157 subjects from previous postexercise CWI trials in the authors' laboratories. CWI protocols varied with different combinations of temperature, duration, immersion depth, and mode (continuous vs intermittent). Tc was examined as a double difference (ΔΔTc), calculated as the change in Tc in CWI condition minus the corresponding change in CON. The effect of CWI on ΔΔTc was assessed using separate linear mixed models across 2 time components (component 1, immersion; component 2, postintervention).
Results
Intermittent CWI resulted in a mean decrease in ΔΔTc that was 0.25°C (0.10°C) (estimate [SE]) greater than continuous CWI during the immersion component (P = .02). There was a significant effect of CWI temperature during the immersion component (P = .05), where reductions in water temperature of 1°C resulted in decreases in ΔΔTc of 0.03°C (0.01°C). Similarly, the effect of CWI duration was significant during the immersion component (P = .01), where every 1 min of immersion resulted in a decrease in ΔΔTc of 0.02°C (0.01°C). The peak difference in Tc between the CWI and CON interventions during the postimmersion component occurred at 60 min postintervention.
Conclusions
Variations in CWI mode, duration, and temperature may have a significant effect on the extent of change in Tc. Careful consideration should be given to determine the optimal amount of core cooling before deciding which combination of protocol factors to prescribe.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.