Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2018

Efficacy of photodynamic therapy or low level laser therapy against steroid therapy in the treatment of erosive-atrophic oral lichen planus

Mirza S, Rehman N, Alrahlah A, Alamri WR, Vohra F

Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy · 49 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Universidad u hospital
Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University

Según 1 financiador declarado.

Publicación

Publicado
2018-02-06 · Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther · vol. 21 · págs. 404–408
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
74 citas · más que el 97% de estudios similares · 6.8× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
42 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Oral Health Pathology and Treatment · Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Oral health in cancer treatment
Palabras clave
photodynamic therapy, low-level laser therapy, topical corticosteroids, toluidine blue, GaAlAs laser, diode laser, oral lesions, pain, treatment efficacy
MeSH
humans, lichen planus, oral, tolonium chloride, dexamethasone, anti-inflammatory agents, photosensitizing agents, photochemotherapy, severity of illness index, adult, aged, middle aged, female, male, lasers, semiconductor, low-level light therapy

5 autores

  • Sana Mirza🇵🇰Ziauddin University
  • Navedur Rehman
  • Ali A. Alrahlah🇸🇦King Saud University
  • Wa’ad Rafa Alamri🇸🇦King Saud University
  • Fahim Ahmed Vohra🇸🇦 · autor de correspondenciaKing Saud University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

The efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) or low level laser therapy (LLLT) in the treatment of oral lichen planus (OLP) is debatable. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of PDT, LLLT or topical corticosteroid application in the treatment of erosive-atrophic OLP.

Materials and methods

Forty-five adult patients with erosive-atrophic biopsy-proven OLP on the tongue or buccal mucosa (size ≤3 cm) were randomly divided into three groups. Group-1: patients receiving PDT topical application of 50 μl toluidine blue (1 mg/ml) with micropipette and after 10 min treated by laser irradiation using GaAlAs laser (630 nm, 10 mW/cm2, continuous wave, spot size: 1 cm2); Group-2: patients receiving LLLT using diode laser (630 nm, 10 mW, continuous wave, spot size: 1 cm2); and Group-3: patients receiving topical corticosteroid applications consisting of dexamethasone (0.5 mg in 5 ml water) mouthwash for 5 min. Demographic data, type, and severity of the lesions and pain were recorded before and after treatment and then at the 1 year follow-up.

Results

There was a significant difference in sign score changes before and after the treatment in the PDT group (p = 0.03), LLLT group (p = 0.04) and in the control group (p = 0.02). There was a statistically significant difference between group-1 (p = 0.001) and group-2 (p = 0.001) against group-3 before and after treatment. Mean amount of improvement in pain was significantly greater in the control group in comparison with the PDT and LLLT groups (p < 0.001). The efficacy index of the PDT group improved significantly more than the LLLT (p = 0.001) and corticosteroid groups (p = 0.001).

Conclusion

Within the limits of the present RCT, it is indicated that PDT and LLLT are effective in the treatment of erosive-atrophic forms of OLP in adult patients. However, further comparative clinical trials are needed to obtain strong conclusions in this regard.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.