Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2019Alimentación controlada

Plasma elemental responses to red meat ingestion in healthy young males and the effect of cooking method

Barnett MPG, Chiang VSC, Milan AM, Pundir S, Walmsley TA, Grant S, Markworth JF, Quek SY, George PM, Cameron-Smith D

European journal of nutrition · 4 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Alimentación controlada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Consumo medido con
Comida provista por los investigadores

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Grupo de la industria
AgResearch
Universidad u hospital
Liggins Institute, The University of Auckland
Subvenciones
AgResearch (A19079)

Según 2 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2018-02-14 · Eur J Nutr · vol. 58 · número 3 · págs. 1047–1054
Editorial
Springer Science+Business Media
Citado
11 citas · más que el 77% de estudios similares · 1.2× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
60 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (copia en repositorio) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Trace Elements in Health · Iron Metabolism and Disorders · Food and Agricultural Sciences
Palabras clave
red meat, beef steaks, cooking methods, sous vide cooking, postprandial response, iron, zinc, trace element bioavailability, dietary iron, dietary zinc
MeSH
humans, zinc, iron, dietary, cross-over studies, biological availability, postprandial period, reference values, adolescent, adult, male, hot temperature, young adult, cooking, red meat

10 autores

  • Matthew P. G. Barnett🇳🇿 · autor de correspondenciaAgResearch; Riddet Institute
  • Vic Shao‐Chih Chiang🇳🇿University of Auckland
  • Amber Marie Milan🇳🇿University of Auckland
  • Shikha Pundir🇳🇿University of Auckland
  • Trevor A. Walmsley🇳🇿Canterbury Health Laboratories
  • Susan M. Grant🇳🇿Canterbury Health Laboratories
  • James F. Markworth🇳🇿University of Auckland
  • Siew Young Quek🇳🇿University of Auckland
  • Peter Myles George🇳🇿Canterbury Health Laboratories
  • David Cameron‐Smith🇳🇿University of Auckland; AgResearch; Riddet Institute

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Purpose

Elemental deficiencies are highly prevalent and have a significant impact on health. However, clinical monitoring of plasma elemental responses to foods remains largely unexplored. Data from in vitro studies show that red meat (beef) is a highly bioavailable source of several key elements, but cooking method may influence this bioavailability. We therefore studied the postprandial responses to beef steak, and the effects of two different cooking methods, in healthy young males.

Methods

In a randomized cross-over controlled trial, healthy males (n = 12, 18-25 years) were fed a breakfast of beef steak (270 ± 20 g) in which the meat was either pan-fried (PF) or sous-vide (SV) cooked. Baseline and postprandial blood samples were collected and the plasma concentrations of 15 elements measured by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS).

Results

Concentrations of Fe and Zn changed after meal ingestion, with plasma Fe increasing (p < 0.001) and plasma Zn decreasing (p < 0.05) in response to both cooking methods. The only potential treatment effect was seen for Zn, where the postprandial area under the curve was lower in response to the SV meal (2965 ± 357) compared to the PF meal (3190 ± 310; p < 0.05).

Conclusions

This multi-element approach demonstrated postprandial responsiveness to a steak meal, and an effect of the cooking method used. This suggests the method would provide insight in future elemental metabolic studies to evaluate responses to meat-based meals, including longer-term interventions in more specifically defined cohorts to clearly establish the role of red meat as an important source of elements.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.