Effect of Cold-Water Immersion on Handgrip Performance in Rock Climbers
Kodejška J, Baláš J, Draper N
International journal of sports physiology and performance · 10 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2018-02-21 · Int J Sports Physiol Perform · vol. 13 · número 8 · págs. 1097–1099
- Editorial
- Human Kinetics
- Citado
- 14 citas · más que el 76% de estudios similares · 1.1× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 11 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Exercise and Physiological Responses · Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation · Sports Performance and Training
- Palabras clave
- Climbing, Medicine, Time trial, Physical therapy, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Internal medicine, Biology
- MeSH
- humans, water, hand strength, immersion, mountaineering, adolescent, adult, female, male, muscle strength dynamometer, athletic performance, cold temperature, young adult
3 autores
- Jan Kodejška🇨🇿Charles University
- Jiří Baláš🇨🇿Charles University
- Nick J. Draper🇳🇿University of Canterbury
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Purpose
To determine the effect of 2 cold-water-immersion (CWI) temperatures (15°C and 8°C) on repeat handgrip performance to failure.
Methods
A total of 32 participants completed 3 intermittent trials to failure on a climbing-specific handgrip dynamometer on 3 laboratory visits. For each visit, a different recovery strategy was employed: passive (PAS) recovery, CWI at 8°C (CW8), or CWI at 15°C (CW15). The force time integral (FTI: time of contraction multiplied by the force of contraction) was determined to assess handgrip performance.
Results
There was no significant difference between recovery strategies at the end of trial 1. In response to the PAS recovery strategy, there were 10% and 22% decreases in FTI in the second and third trials, respectively. The PAS recovery-strategy FTI values were lower than both CWI strategies for trials 2 and 3 (P < .05). FTI increased in the second trial (↑32% and ↑38%; P < .05) for both immersion strategies (CW8 and CW15, respectively) compared with trial 1. During the third trial, FTI was significantly higher for CW15 than CW8 (↑27% and ↓4% with respect to baseline trial; P < .05).
Conclusions
The results suggest that CWI has potential performance advantages over PAS recovery for rock climbing. The data show that in events where multiple recoveries are required, 15°C CWI may be more beneficial for climbers than 8°C CWI. Future research should focus on the optimization of protocols for sport performance.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.