Photobiomodulation Therapy on Physiological and Performance Parameters During Running Tests: Dose-Response Effects
Dellagrana RA, Rossato M, Sakugawa RL, Baroni BM, Diefenthaeler F
Journal of strength and conditioning research · 32 citas
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
- Gobierno
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
- Gobierno
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Según 2 financiadores declarados.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2018-02-25 · J Strength Cond Res · vol. 32 · número 10 · págs. 2807–2815
- Editorial
- Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
- Citado
- 42 citas · más que el 94% de estudios similares · 3.6× el promedio de su campo
- Impacto
- Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
- Referencias
- 43 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Sports Performance and Training · Exercise and Physiological Responses
- Palabras clave
- low-level laser therapy, running economy, running performance, dose-response relationship, energy dose, rating of perceived exertion, time to exhaustion, oxygen consumption, recreational runners, exercise physiology, placebo effect, submaximal running, peak velocity
- MeSH
- lower extremity, humans, lactic acid, cross-over studies, double-blind method, oxygen consumption, muscle fatigue, running, adult, male, athletic performance, young adult, low-level light therapy
5 autores
- Rodolfo André Dellagrana🇧🇷Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
- Mateus Fortes Rossato🇧🇷Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; Universidade Federal do Amazonas
- Raphael Luiz Sakugawa🇧🇷Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
- Bruno Manfredini Baroni🇧🇷Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre
- Fernando Diefenthaeler🇧🇷 · autor de correspondenciaUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Dellagrana, RA, Rossato, M, Sakugawa, RL, Baroni, BM, and Diefenthaeler, F. Photobiomodulation therapy on physiological and performance parameters during running tests: Dose-response effects. J Strength Cond Res 32(10): 2807-2815, 2018-This study was aimed at verifying effects of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) with different energy doses (15, 30, and 60 J per site) on physiological and performance parameters during running tests. Fifteen male recreational runners participated in a crossover, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial. They performed testing protocol in 5 sessions with different treatments: control, placebo, and PBMT with 15, 30, or 60 J per site (14 sites in each lower limb). Physiological and performance variables were assessed during submaximal (at 8 and 9 km·h) and maximal running tests. Photobiomodulation therapy with 30 J significantly improved running economy (RE) at 8 and 9 km·h (3.01%, p=0.008 and 3.03%, p=0.009, respectively), rate of perceived exertion (RPE) at 8 km/h21 (7.86%, p=0.033), velocity at V[Combining Dot Above]O2max (3.07%, p= 0.029), peak of velocity (PV) (1.49%, p=0.035), and total time to exhaustion (TTE) (3.41%, p=0.036) compared with placebo. Photobiomodulation therapy with 15 J improved running economy at 9 km/h21 (2.98%, p=0.025), rate of perceived exertion at 8 km/h21 (4.80%, p=0.010), PV (1.33%, p=0.008), total time to exhaustion (3.06%, p=0.008), and total distance (4.01%, p=0.011) compared with the placebo; whereas PBMT with 60 J only increased RE at 9 km/h21 (3.87%, p=0.024) compared with placebo. All PBMT doses positively affected physiological and/or performance parameters; however, magnitude-based inference reported that PBMT applied with 30 J led to more beneficial effects than 15 and 60 J.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.