Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Revisión sistemática2018Financiación no declarada

Is it Safe to Reduce Water Intake in the Overactive Bladder Population? A Systematic Review

Wood LN, Markowitz MA, Parameshwar PS, Hannemann AJ, Ogawa SL, Anger JT, Eilber KS

The Journal of urology · 7 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2018-03-01 · J Urol · vol. 200 · número 2 · págs. 375–381
Editorial
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Citado
15 citas · más que el 40% de estudios similares · 0.2× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
32 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Thermoregulation and physiological responses · Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research · Pelvic floor disorders treatments
Palabras clave
Medicine, Overactive bladder, Fluid intake, Constipation, Population, Disease, Headaches, Stroke (engine), Intensive care medicine, Internal medicine, Urology, Surgery, Environmental health, Pathology
MeSH
humans, dehydration, disease progression, recurrence, comorbidity, drinking, patient selection, urinary bladder, overactive, nephrolithiasis, patient education as topic, stroke, recommended dietary allowances

7 autores

  • Lauren N. Wood🇺🇸University of California, Los Angeles
  • Melissa A. Markowitz🇺🇸University of California, Los Angeles
  • Pooja S. Parameshwar🇺🇸Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
  • Alex Hannemann🇺🇸University of South Dakota
  • Shellee L. Ogawa🇺🇸University of California, Los Angeles
  • Jennifer Tash Anger🇺🇸Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
  • KARYN SCHLUNT EILBER🇺🇸Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Purpose

Overactive bladder imposes a significant socioeconomic burden on the health care system. It is a commonly held belief that increased fluid intake (8 glasses of water per day) is beneficial for health. However, increased fluid intake exacerbates overactive bladder symptoms. Thus, it is imperative that clinicians appropriately educate patients for whom increased water intake may be detrimental (women with overactive bladder), in contrast to patients with comorbidities that necessitate increased water intake (nephrolithiasis). We systematically reviewed the literature to determine the potential health advantages of increased water intake and identify specific subpopulations that need increased hydration.

Materials and methods

We systematically reviewed published articles from 1972 through 2017 on PubMed® and the Cochrane Library. The data were reviewed independently by 2 individuals. Studies were included if they explored water intake in relation to the risk of a particular disease.

Results

Level 1 evidence supported increased fluid intake in patients with nephrolithiasis. There was no available evidence to support increased fluid intake in patients with cardiovascular disease, constipation, venous thromboembolism, headaches, cognitive function or bladder cancer. Dehydration may exacerbate some conditions, specifically chronic constipation and headache intensity. Increased fluid intake may have a role in preventing stroke recurrence but not in preventing primary stroke.

Conclusions

The available reviewed literature suggests no benefit to drinking 8 glasses of water per day in patients without nephrolithiasis. Also, excess fluid intake can exacerbate symptoms of overactive bladder.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.