Processed Meat and Risk of Renal Cell and Bladder Cancers
Rosato V, Negri E, Serraino D, Montella M, Libra M, Lagiou P, Facchini G, Ferraroni M, Decarli A, La Vecchia C
Nutrition and cancer · 6 citas
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
- Consumo medido con
- No se indica
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
Según 1 financiador declarado.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2018-03-23 · Nutr Cancer · vol. 70 · número 3 · págs. 418–424
- Editorial
- Routledge
- Citado
- 9 citas · más que el 72% de estudios similares · 0.7× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 35 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Nutritional Studies and Diet · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
- Palabras clave
- Medicine, Urology, Bladder cancer, Internal medicine, Oncology, Cancer
- MeSH
- humans, carcinoma, renal cell, kidney neoplasms, odds ratio, risk factors, case-control studies, eating, food handling, meat products, adult, aged, middle aged, italy, female, male, urinary bladder neoplasms
10 autores
- Valentina Rosato
- Eva Negri🇮🇹University of Milan
- Diego Serraino🇮🇹Centro di Riferimento Oncologico
- Maurizio Montella🇮🇹Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale"
- Massimo Libra🇮🇹University of Catania
- Pagona Lagiou🇺🇸🇬🇷Harvard University; National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
- Gaetano Facchini🇮🇹Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale"
- Monica Ferraroni🇮🇹 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Milan
- Adriano Decarli🇮🇹University of Milan
- Carlo La Vecchia🇮🇹University of Milan
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
We assessed the association of processed meat intake with the risk of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and bladder cancer. We used data from two Italian hospital-based case-control studies, including 1,115 RCC cases and 2,582 controls, and 1,417 bladder cancer cases and 1,732 controls. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with unconditional logistic regression models, adjusted for major confounders. The median consumption of processed meat in cases and controls was around 2 portions/week (50 g/portion). The ORs for a daily 10 g increment of processed meat was 0.89 (95% CI 0.84-0.94) for RCC and 1.00 (95% CI 0.94-1.06) for bladder cancer. The OR for the highest vs. the lowest consumption was 0.80 (95% CI 0.66-0.96) for RCC and 0.98 (95% CI 0.80-1.21) for bladder cancer. The ORs were consistent in strata of various covariates. For bladder cancer, however, a significant 23% excess risk was found in women (95% CI 1.03-1.47) for a daily increase of 10 g, significantly heterogeneous from the risk recorded in men (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.90-1.02). The inconsistent results between men and women and the absence of association in both sexes combined indicate that the apparent association between processed meat and bladder cancer in women is unlikely to be causal.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.