Evaluation of the low-level laser therapy application parameters for skin burn treatment in experimental model: a systematic review
Brassolatti P, de Andrade ALM, Bossini PS, Otterço AN, Parizotto NA
Lasers in medical science · 19 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Animales
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2018-05-05 · Lasers Med Sci · vol. 33 · número 5 · págs. 1159–1169
- Editorial
- Springer Science+Business Media
- Citado
- 37 citas · más que el 61% de estudios similares · 0.8× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 37 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Dermatologic Treatments and Research · Biofield Effects and Biophysics
- Palabras clave
- low-level laser therapy, burns, burn wound healing, laser dosimetry, fluence, microcirculation, cell proliferation
- MeSH
- skin, animals, humans, burns, wound healing, evaluation studies as topic, low-level light therapy
5 autores
- Patrícia Brassolatti🇧🇷 · autor de correspondenciaUniversidade Federal de São Carlos
- Ana Laura Martins de Andrade🇧🇷Universidade Federal de São Carlos
- Paulo Sérgio Bossini
- Albaiza Nicoletti Otterço🇧🇷Universidade Federal de São Carlos
- Nivaldo Antônio Parizotto🇧🇷Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Burn is defined as a traumatic injury of thermal origin, which affects the organic tissue. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has gained great prominence as a treatment in this type of injury; however, the application parameters are still controversial in the literature. The aims of this study were to review the literature studies that use LLLT as a treatment in burns conducted in an experimental model, discuss the main parameters used, and highlight the benefits found in order to choose an appropriate therapeutic window to be applied in this type of injury. The selection of the studies related to the theme was carried out in the main databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, LILACS, Web of Science, and Scopus in the period from 2001 to 2017). Subsequently, the articles were then chosen that fell within the inclusion criteria previously established. In the end, 22 were evaluated, and the main parameters were presented. The analyzed studies presented both LLLT use in continuous and pulsed mode. Differences between the parameters used (power, fluence, and total energy) were observed. In addition, the protocols are distinct as to the type of injury and the number of treatment sessions. Among the results obtained by the authors are the improvements in the local microcirculation and cellular proliferation; however, a study reported no effects with LLLT as a treatment. LLLT is effective in accelerating the healing process. However, there is immense difficulty in establishing the most adequate protocol, due to the great discrepancy found in the applied dosimetry values.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.