Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2018

Low level laser therapy for the management of breast cancer-related lymphedema: A randomized controlled feasibility study

Baxter GD, Liu L, Tumilty S, Petrich S, Chapple C, Anders JJ, Laser Lymphedema Trial Team

Lasers in surgery and medicine · 19 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Organización sin fines de lucro
Breast Cancer Foundation New Zealand
Organización sin fines de lucro
New Zealand Breast Cancer Foundation

Según 2 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2018-05-30 · Lasers Surg Med · vol. 50 · número 9 · págs. 924–932
Editorial
Wiley
Citado
33 citas · más que el 85% de estudios similares · 1.9× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
25 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Lymphatic System and Diseases · Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Palabras clave
breast cancer-related lymphedema, low-level laser therapy, feasibility, randomized controlled trial design, compression garments, lymphedema treatment, participant retention, medication adherence, limb circumference, psychological impact, adverse effects, participant satisfaction
MeSH
humans, feasibility studies, research design, aged, middle aged, female, low-level light therapy, breast cancer lymphedema, outcome assessment, health care

7 autores

  • David G. Baxter🇳🇿 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Otago
  • Lizhou Liu🇳🇿University of Otago
  • Steve Tumilty🇳🇿University of Otago
  • Simone Petrich🇳🇿Southern District Health Board
  • Cathy Chapple🇳🇿University of Otago
  • Juanita J. Anders🇺🇸Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
  • On Behalf of the Laser Lymphedema Trial Team

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objectives

This study aimed to determine the feasibility of conducting a full scale randomized controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of low level laser therapy (LLLT), also known as photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy, used in addition to conventional therapy, for managing breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL).

Materials and methods

Patients with BCRL were recruited from the Southern District Health Board (New Zealand) via lymphedema therapists' referrals, and randomly allocated into either the laser group, which received BCRL conventional therapy (e.g., wearing compression garments, massage therapy, and/or exercise) plus a 6-week LLLT (PBM) intervention program (wavelength: 980/810 nm (80:20 ratio); output power: 500 mW beam spot size: 5 cm2 ; irradiance: 100 mW/cm2 ; treatment time per area: 1 minute dosage per area treated: 30J (6J/cm2 ); 10 points of treatment from axilla to wrist total LLLT (PBM) treatment time: 10 minutes total dosage delivered: 300 J), or the control group, which received BCRL conventional therapy alone. Feasibility was determined by recruitment and randomization rates, retention of participants and treatment protocol adherence, and was assessed during the recruiting and intervention periods. Data on participant satisfaction and adverse reactions of LLLT (PBM) were collected on completion of this study. Clinical outcomes (i.e., limb circumference, participant's perceived symptoms, psychological impacts, and activity disability) were assessed at baseline, and 6 and 12 weeks post-randomization.

Results

Over a 6-month recruitment window, 17 participants with BCRL were recruited in the study, and randomized into the two groups (recruitment rate of 81%, and randomization rate of 100%). Treatment adherence was high in the laser group (88.9% of participants completed all treatments). Retention rates were 88.9% for the laser group and 100% for the control group at both 6 and 12 weeks post-randomization. All participants who completed LLLT (PBM) treatment indicated that they were satisfied with the treatment. No serious adverse reactions were reported in this study. Clinical outcomes failed to show additional benefits of LLLT (PBM) intervention.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that it is feasible to conduct a fully powered RCT to definitively test the effectiveness of the additional use of LLLT (PBM) in the management of BCRL. For such a trial, 114 participants will be needed at baseline. Lasers Surg. Med. 50:924-932, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.