Financiado en parte por General Mills, General Mills Bell Institute of Health, Nutrition and Food Safety
Evaluating Whole Grain Intervention Study Designs and Reporting Practices Using Evidence Mapping Methodology
Sawicki CM, Livingston KA, Ross AB, Jacques PF, Koecher K, McKeown NM
Nutrients · 13 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiado por la industriaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Revisión sistemática (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
- Consumo medido con
- No se indica
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiado por la industria
- Empresa
- General Mills
- Empresa
- General Mills Bell Institute of Health, Nutrition and Food Safety
Según 2 financiadores declarados.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2018-08-09 · Nutrients · vol. 10 · número 8 · pág. 1052
- Editorial
- Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
- Citado
- 17 citas · más que el 83% de estudios similares · 1.7× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 57 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
- Áreas de investigación
- Food composition and properties · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
- Palabras clave
- Observational study, Whole grains, Medicine, Psychological intervention, Clinical trial, MEDLINE, Intervention (counseling), Refined grains, Randomized controlled trial, Internal medicine, Food science
- MeSH
- humans, treatment outcome, diet therapy, endpoint determination, patient compliance, nutritive value, research design, time factors, clinical trials as topic, evidence-based practice, recommended dietary allowances, portion size, whole grains, diet, healthy
6 autores
- Caleigh M Sawicki🇺🇸Tufts University; Jean Mayer Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging
- Kara A. Livingston🇺🇸Tufts University; Jean Mayer Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging
- Alastair B. Ross🇸🇪Chalmers University of Technology
- Paul F. Jacques🇺🇸Tufts University; Jean Mayer Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging
- Katie J. Koecher🇺🇸General Mills (United States)
- Nicola Mary McKeown🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaTufts University; Jean Mayer Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Consumption of whole grains have been associated with reduced risk of chronic diseases in many observational studies; yet, results of intervention studies are mixed. We aimed to use evidence mapping to capture the methodological and reporting variability in whole grain intervention studies that may contribute to this inconsistency. We conducted a reproducible search in OVID Medline for whole grain human intervention studies (published 1946 to February 2018). After screening based on a priori criteria, we identified 202 publications describing a total of 213 unique trials. Over half (55%) were acute trials, lasting ≤1 day, 30% were moderate duration studies (up to 6 weeks) and 15% were of longer duration (more than 6 weeks). The majority of acute trials (75%) examined measures of glycaemia and/or insulinemia, while most of the longer trials included measures of cardiometabolic health (71%), appetite/satiety (57%) and weight/adiposity (56%). Among the moderate and long duration trials, there was a wide range of how whole grains were described but only 10 publications referenced an established definition. Only 55% of trials reported the actual amount of whole grains (in grams or servings), while 36% reported the amount of food/product and 9% did not report a dose at all. Of the interventions that provided a mixture of whole grains, less than half (46%) reported the distribution of the different grain types. Reporting of subject compliance also varied and only 22% used independent biomarkers of whole grain intake. This evidence map highlights the need to standardize both study protocols and reporting practices to support effective synthesis of study results and provide a stronger foundation to better inform nutrition scientists and public health policy.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.