Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2018Financiado por la industria

Financiado en parte por PepsiCo

The effects of whole-grain compared with refined wheat, rice, and rye on the postprandial blood glucose response: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Musa-Veloso K, Poon T, Harkness LS, O'Shea M, Chu Y

The American journal of clinical nutrition · 63 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiado por la industria

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Consumo medido con
No se indica

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiado por la industria
Empresa
PepsiCo

Según 1 financiador declarado.

Publicación

Publicado
2018-05-14 · Am J Clin Nutr · vol. 108 · número 4 · págs. 759–774
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
94 citas · más que el 76% de estudios similares · 1.4× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
44 trabajos
Acceso
Lectura gratuita
Áreas de investigación
Food composition and properties · Seed and Plant Biochemistry · Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies
Palabras clave
whole grains, refined grains, postprandial blood glucose, whole grain rice, white rice, white wheat, grain processing, glycemic response, dietary fiber, food matrix effects, germination, grinding
MeSH
humans, triticum, blood glucose, postprandial period, bread, dietary fiber, flour, adult, aged, middle aged, female, male, young adult, oryza, secale, whole grains

5 autores

  • Kathy Musa‐Veloso🇨🇦 · autor de correspondenciaIntertek (Canada)
  • Theresa H. Poon🇨🇦Intertek (Canada)
  • Laura S Harkness🇺🇸Church & Dwight (United States)
  • Marianne O’Shea🇺🇸Pepsi (United States)
  • YiFang Chu🇺🇸Pepsi (United States)

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Whole grains are often referred to collectively, despite differences in their composition, physical structure, processing, and potential health benefits.

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the postprandial blood glucose response of whole-grain with refined wheat, rice, or rye, while controlling for the food delivery matrix and the processing of the grain (e.g., grinding, germination).

Design

Eleven electronic databases were systematically searched to identify studies published up to and including November 2017. Randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of whole-grain wheat, rice, or rye with those of each grain's refined counterpart on postprandial blood glucose area under the curve (AUC) were included. Pooled effect sizes were computed by using the difference in the blood glucose AUC after the consumption of the whole compared with the refined grain.

Results

Twenty publications were included, with 10, 14, and 5 strata (or active-control comparisons) on whole-grain wheat, rice, and rye, respectively. The consumption of ground (wholemeal) wheat, compared with white wheat, was not associated with a significant reduction in blood glucose AUC (-6.7 mmol/L ⋅ min; 95% CI: -25.1, 11.7 mmol/L ⋅ min; P = 0.477). The consumption of wholemeal rye, compared with endosperm rye, was not associated with a significant reduction in blood glucose AUC (-5.5 mmol/L ⋅ min; 95% CI: -24.8, 13.8 mmol/L ⋅ min; P = 0.576). The consumption of intact (whole-grain) rice, compared with white rice, was associated with a significant reduction in blood glucose AUC (-40.5 mmol/L ⋅ min; 95% CI: -59.6, -21.3 mmol/L ⋅ min; P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Compared with white rice, whole-grain rice significantly attenuates the postprandial blood glucose response. In most of the studies on wheat and rye, the postprandial blood glucose responses to foods formulated with wholemeal compared with refined flours were compared. Whether reductions in the blood glucose AUC can be achieved with whole-grain (as opposed to wholemeal) wheat and rye requires further investigation.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.