Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio de cohortes2018Financiado por la industriaCuestionario de frecuencia de consumoSin ajuste declarado por estilo de vidaAcceso abierto

Financiado en parte por American Egg Board

Unscrambling the relations of egg and meat consumption with type 2 diabetes risk

Sabaté J, Burkholder-Cooley NM, Segovia-Siapco G, Oda K, Wells B, Orlich MJ, Fraser GE

The American journal of clinical nutrition · 19 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumoFinanciado por la industriaSin ajuste declarado por estilo de vida

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio de cohortes (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Consumo medido con
Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumo

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiado por la industria
Gobierno
National Cancer Institute
Gobierno
NCI NIH HHS
Grupo de la industria
American Egg Board
Subvenciones
National Cancer Institute (U01 CA152939); National Cancer Institute (1U01CA152939)

Según 3 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2018-08-22 · Am J Clin Nutr · vol. 108 · número 5 · págs. 1121–1128
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
21 citas · más que el 90% de estudios similares · 2.6× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
41 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY-NC
Áreas de investigación
Nutritional Studies and Diet · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Palabras clave
Type 2 diabetes, Consumption (sociology), Food science, Business, Medicine, Diabetes mellitus, Biology, Endocrinology, Art
MeSH
humans, diabetes mellitus, type 2, diet, diet surveys, logistic models, odds ratio, risk factors, longitudinal studies, prospective studies, feeding behavior, energy intake, eggs, meat, adult, aged, middle aged, female, male

7 autores

  • Joan Sabaté · autor de correspondencia
  • Nasira M Burkholder-Cooley🇺🇸Chapman University
  • Gina Segovia‐Siapco
  • Keiji Oda
  • Briana Wells
  • Michael J. Orlich🇺🇸Loma Linda University
  • Gary E. Fraser🇺🇸Loma Linda University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Meat intake is associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). It is not clear if egg intake is associated with T2D risk because purported associations may be due to concurrent consumption of eggs with meat.

Objective

Our aim was to differentiate any associations between meat and egg consumption and the risk of T2D.

Design

In this longitudinal study, 55,851 participants of the Adventist Health Study 2 who were free of diabetes provided demographic, anthropometric, and dietary data at baseline. Meat and egg intakes were assessed with a validated quantitative food-frequency questionnaire. Responses to 2 follow-up questionnaires determined incident T2D cases. Multivariate-adjusted logistic regression was used to determine relations between meat and egg intake and incident T2D.

Results

T2D cases identified during a mean 5.3 y of follow-up totaled 2772. Meat intake of >0 to <25 g/d, ≥25 to <70 g/d, and ≥70 g/d significantly increased the risk of T2D compared with no meat intake (OR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.16, 1.44; OR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.25, 1.61; and OR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.39, 1.96, respectively; P-trend < 0.0001). Egg intake compared with no egg intake was not associated with T2D risk. A significant meat-egg interaction (P = 0.019) showed that within every category of egg intake, there was an incremental rise in T2D risk as meat intake increased. However, within categories of meat intake, increasing egg intake did not increase the risk of T2D except among nonmeat-eaters consuming ≥5 eggs/wk (OR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.09, 2.12).

Conclusions

Meat consumption, but not egg consumption, is independently associated with T2D risk. Egg intake seems not to increase T2D risk further with meat intake. Our findings suggest that the purported egg-T2D risk relation in US populations may be biased due to failure to investigate egg-meat interactions. Further investigations are needed to ascertain T2D risk among nonmeat-eaters with high egg intakes.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY-NC).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.