Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2019Financiación no declarada

Effect of photobiomodulation with low-level laser therapy combined with potassium nitrate on controlling post-bleaching tooth sensitivity: clinical, randomized, controlled, double-blind, and split-mouth study

de Paula B, Alencar C, Ortiz M, Couto R, Araújo J, Silva C

Clinical oral investigations · 20 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2018-10-25 · Clin Oral Investig · vol. 23 · número 6 · págs. 2723–2732
Editorial
Springer Nature
Citado
33 citas · más que el 92% de estudios similares · 3.5× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
73 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Dental Erosion and Treatment · Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
Palabras clave
low-level laser therapy, potassium nitrate, dentin hypersensitivity, tooth bleaching, hydrogen peroxide bleaching, synergistic effect
MeSH
humans, dentin sensitivity, nitrates, hydrogen peroxide, potassium compounds, treatment outcome, double-blind method, tooth bleaching, adult, female, male, young adult, tooth bleaching agents, low-level light therapy

6 autores

  • Brennda Lucy Freitas de Paula🇧🇷Universidade Federal do Pará
  • Cristiane de Melo Alencar🇧🇷Universidade Federal do Pará
  • Mariângela Ivette Guanipa Ortiz🇧🇷Universidade Federal do Pará
  • Roberta Souza D’Almeida Couto🇧🇷Universidade Federal do Pará
  • Jesuína Lamartine Nogueira Araújo🇧🇷Universidade Federal do Pará
  • Cecy Martins Silva🇧🇷 · autor de correspondenciaUniversidade Federal do Pará

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objectives

To evaluate the effect of photobiomodulation with low-level laser therapy (PBM-LLLT) combined with 5% potassium nitrate (KNO3) on controlling tooth sensitivity (TS) after in-office tooth bleaching.

Materials and methods

Fifty volunteers were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were randomly allocated into four groups: G1 (control): placebo gel application, 35% hydrogen peroxide bleaching (HP35) and mock PBM-LLLT without light emission; G2: placebo gel application, bleaching with HP35 and PBM-LLLT; G3: application of KNO3, bleaching with HP35 and mock PBM-LLLT; and G4: application of KNO3, bleaching with HP35 and PBM-LLLT. A pain assessment questionnaire was used to evaluate TS during the 21 days of treatment. The Friedman test was used for intragroup analysis, and the Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests were used for intergroup comparisons.

Results

The intragroup evaluation showed significant differences among the evaluation times in all groups (p ≤ 0.05). The highest pain sensitivity levels were recorded on the 1st, 8th, and 15th days. In G1, TS manifested for up to 3 days after each bleaching session, while G2, G3, and G4 presented TS only on the days of the bleaching sessions. Intergroup analysis showed that TS manifestation differed significantly between G1 and the other groups (p ≤ 0.05) but did not differ significantly among G2, G3, and G4 (p ≥ 0.05).

Conclusion

PBM-LLLT and KNO3 are effective at reducing pain sensitivity after tooth bleaching, but no synergistic effect between these treatments was observed for the different evaluation periods.

Clinical relevance

The effect of PBM-LLLT combined with KNO3 on post-bleaching tooth sensitivity is similar to their individual use alone.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.