Abrasion injuries on artificial turf: A systematic review
Twomey DM, Petrass LA, Fleming P, Lenehan K
Journal of science and medicine in sport · 7 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2018-11-16 · J Sci Med Sport · vol. 22 · número 5 · págs. 550–556
- Editorial
- Elsevier BV
- Citado
- 19 citas · más que el 34% de estudios similares · 0.2× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 51 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (copia en repositorio) · CC-BY-NC-ND
- Áreas de investigación
- Sports injuries and prevention · Shoulder Injury and Treatment · Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
- Palabras clave
- Abrasion (mechanical), Scopus, Inclusion (mineral), Poison control, Injury prevention, Occupational safety and health, MEDLINE, Forensic engineering, Human factors and ergonomics, Physical therapy, Medicine, Psychology, Engineering, Environmental health, Mechanical engineering, Social psychology, Political science, Pathology
- MeSH
- humans, athletic injuries, soft tissue injuries, incidence, risk, floors and floorcoverings, sports equipment
4 autores
- D. Twomey🇦🇺 · autor de correspondenciaFederation University
- Lauren A. Petrass🇦🇺Federation University
- Paul Richard Fleming🇬🇧Loughborough University
- Kurt A Lenehan🇦🇺Federation University
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Objectives
To review the incidence of abrasion injuries sustained on artificial turf playing fields and the level of evidence existing on player perceptions of abrasion injuries on these surfaces.
Design
Systematic review.
Method
A systematic search was performed using SPORTDiscus, Medline, Web of Science, Scopus and Science Direct databases. Inclusion criteria included: abrasion type injuries measured; conducted on artificial/synthetic turf; type of sport reported; peer-reviewed original research; English language search terms, but no language restrictions. A quality assessment was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality scale.
Results
The search yielded 76 potential articles, with 25 meeting all inclusion criteria. Twenty articles were injury-based and five were perception-based. The differences in injury definition and the lack of details of the playing surfaces produced varying results on the rate of injuries on artificial turf. Regardless of the condition of the surface, the level of play, or the sport, players perceived the fear of abrasion injuries as a major disadvantage of artificial turf surfaces.
Conclusions
The review highlighted the current disparity that exists between players' perceptions of abrasion injuries and the level of evidence of abrasion injury risk on artificial turf playing surfaces. There is a need for the inclusion of greater detail of playing surfaces' specifications and condition, and an injury definition sufficiently sensitive to better measure abrasion injury incidence and severity. Without this more detailed information, it is likely that the strongly perceived risk of abrasion injuries will continue as a barrier to the adoption of artificial playing surfaces.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.