Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2018

Does Low-Level Laser Therapy Affect Recovery of Lingual and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injuries?

Miloro M, Criddle TR

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 20 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Universidad u hospital
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Universidad u hospital
Aarhus Universitet

Según 2 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2018-06-11 · J Oral Maxillofac Surg · vol. 76 · número 12 · págs. 2669–2675
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
42 citas · más que el 90% de estudios similares · 2.7× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
15 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Dental Radiography and Imaging · Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
Palabras clave
low-level laser therapy, lingual nerve injury, inferior alveolar nerve injury, iatrogenic nerve injury, dental implant surgery, local anesthetic injection complications
MeSH
humans, postoperative complications, treatment outcome, follow-up studies, prospective studies, double-blind method, adult, female, male, trigeminal nerve injuries, low-level light therapy

2 autores

  • Michael Miloro🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Illinois Chicago
  • Thalia-Rae Criddle🇺🇸University of Illinois Chicago

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Purpose

Iatrogenic damage to the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) and lingual nerve (LN) may occur during routine oral and maxillofacial surgery procedures. The primary aim of this study was to determine, using a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial, whether the proportion of nerve-injured patients with postoperative neurosensory improvement over a 3-month period differed significantly between a control group and a low-level laser therapy (LLLT) group.

Patients and methods

The study sample consisted of 35 patients with iatrogenic nerve injury due to third molar odontectomy, dental implant placement, or local anesthetic injection. The investigators used a randomized, double-blind laser delivery system to administer either placebo or LLLT to patients who met the inclusion criteria. The outcome variable of neurosensory improvement was defined as a minimum 1-unit increase from baseline in visual analog scale rating and was based on standard objective clinical neurosensory testing. Study variables included the affected nerve (IAN or LN) and time from injury to treatment (3 to 12 months or >12 months). Univariate statistical analysis (χ2 test) was performed to determine significance between the groups.

Results

Neurosensory improvement was observed in 46.7% of the LLLT patients, who showed at least a 1-unit improvement at 3 months, compared with 38.5% improvement for controls (P = .66), regardless of the specific nerve involved (IAN or LN). In addition, no observed difference was noted between the study groups based on time from injury to treatment.

Conclusions

This study failed to provide sufficient evidence to conclude that a difference in neurosensory improvement exists between the LLLT and placebo groups with IAN or LN injuries. However, this study is unique in the prospective double-blind study design and comprehensive neurosensory testing protocols. There is a continued need for further clinical studies on LLLT in oral and maxillofacial surgery nerve injuries.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.