Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2020

Neurodevelopmental effects of prenatal vitamin D in humans: systematic review and meta-analysis

García-Serna AM, Morales E

Molecular psychiatry · 95 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
Gobierno
Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Gobierno
Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness | Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Subvenciones
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (MS14/00046); Instituto de Salud Carlos III (MS14 /00046)

Según 3 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2019-01-29 · Mol Psychiatry · vol. 25 · número 10 · págs. 2468–2481
Editorial
Springer Nature
Citado
119 citas · más que el 92% de estudios similares · 2.8× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
60 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Vitamin D Research Studies · Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum · Birth, Development, and Health
Palabras clave
prenatal vitamin D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, brain development, cognitive development, psychomotor development, language development, behavioral problems, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autistic traits, vitamin D deficiency, pregnancy
MeSH
humans, prenatal exposure delayed effects, vitamin d deficiency, vitamin d, cognition, attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity, autistic disorder, aging, pregnancy, infant, newborn, female, neurodevelopmental disorders

2 autores

  • Azahara M. García‐Serna🇪🇸Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria; Universidad de Murcia
  • Eva Morales🇪🇸 · autor de correspondenciaInstituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública; Universidad de Murcia

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Diverse studies have investigated the impact of prenatal exposure to vitamin D levels on brain development; however, evidence in humans has never been systematically reviewed. This article summarized evidence of the association between 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels in maternal blood in pregnancy or newborn blood at birth and neurodevelopmental outcomes, including cognition, psychomotor performance, language development, behavioral difficulties, attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and autistic traits. PubMed, Web of Science and SCOPUS databases were systematically searched for epidemiologic studies published through May 2018 using keywords. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted. Of 260 identified articles, 25 were included in the present review. Comparing the highest vs. the lowest category of prenatal 25(OH)D levels, the pooled beta coefficients were 0.95 (95% CI -0.03, 1.93; p = 0.05) for cognition, and 0.88 (95% CI -0.18, 1.93; p = 0.10) for psychomotor development. The pooled relative risk for ADHD was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.59, 0.89; p = 0.002), and the pooled odds ratio for autism-related traits was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.25, 0.71; p = 0.001). There was little evidence for protective effects of high prenatal 25(OH)D for language development and behavior difficulties. This meta-analysis provides supporting evidence that increased prenatal exposure to 25(OH)D levels is associated with improved cognitive development and reduced risk of ADHD and autism-related traits later in life. Associations represent a potentially high public health burden given the current prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency among childbearing aging and pregnant women.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.