Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Revisión sistemática2019Financiación no declarada

Influence of low-level laser therapy on orthodontically-induced inflammatory root resorption. A systematic review

Michelogiannakis D, Al-Shammery D, Akram Z, Rossouw PE, Javed F, Romanos GE

Archives of oral biology · 22 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas, más trabajo en animales o laboratorio
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2019-01-30 · Arch Oral Biol · vol. 100 · págs. 1–13
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
26 citas · más que el 66% de estudios similares · 0.8× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
76 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Palabras clave
low-level laser therapy, orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption, orthodontic tooth movement, bone grafting, alloplastic bone substitutes
MeSH
animals, humans, root resorption, inflammation, prospective studies, low-level light therapy, tooth movement techniques

6 autores

  • Dimitrios Michelogiannakis🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Rochester Medicine; University of Rochester
  • Deema Al‐Shammery🇸🇦Riyadh Elm University
  • Zohaib Akram🇦🇺The University of Western Australia
  • Paul Emile Rossouw🇺🇸University of Rochester Medicine; University of Rochester
  • Fawad Javed🇺🇸Stony Brook School; Stony Brook University
  • Georgios E. Romanos🇺🇸Stony Brook School; Stony Brook University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objective

The aim was to assess the influence of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on orthodontically-induced inflammatory root resorption (OIIRR).

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in indexed databases following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The eligibility criteria were as follows: (a) original clinical and animal/experimental studies; (b) prospective studies; (c) intervention: effect of LLLT on OIIRR; (d) control group (OIIRR without LLLT); (e) statistical analysis; and (f) tomographic or histologic assessment of OIIRR. Quality assessment of the experimental and clinical studies was performed following the Animal Research Reporting In-vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) and Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines, respectively. The risk of bias of the included studies was also determined.

Results

Nine (7 experimental and 2 clinical) of the initially identified 39 studies were included. One clinical and 2 experimental studies showed that LLLT during orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) significantly reduces OIIRR. One experimental study reported that LLLT during OTM in sockets treated with alloplastic materials significantly reduces OIIRR. One experimental study found that LLLT after OTM significantly repairs OIIRR, whereas one clinical study did not report a significant reparative affect. Three experimental studies showed that LLLT increases OIIRR during OTM, corticotomized-OTM, and OTM into grafted defects, respectively. The minimum, median and highest ARRIVE scores (out of 20) of the included experimental studies were 15, 17 and 19, respectively. The mean CONSORT score of the included clinical studies was 23 (out of 25).

Conclusions

In conclusion, the influence of LLLT on OIIRR remains debatable.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.