Financiado en parte por Nestec
Animal foods and postmenopausal breast cancer risk: a prospective cohort study
Marcondes LH, Franco OH, Ruiter R, Ikram MA, Mulder M, Stricker BH, Kiefte-de Jong JC
The British journal of nutrition · 11 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumoFinanciado por la industriaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Estudio de cohortes (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
- Consumo medido con
- Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumo
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiado por la industria
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- American Institute for Cancer Research
- Empresa
- Nestec
Según 2 financiadores declarados.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2019-03-04 · Br J Nutr · vol. 122 · número 5 · págs. 583–591
- Editorial
- Cambridge University Press
- Citado
- 21 citas · más que el 91% de estudios similares · 3.1× el promedio de su campo
- Impacto
- Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
- Referencias
- 49 trabajos
- Acceso
- Lectura gratuita
- Áreas de investigación
- Nutritional Studies and Diet · Cancer Risks and Factors · Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
- Palabras clave
- Breast cancer, Medicine, Prospective cohort study, Hazard ratio, Proportional hazards model, Cancer, Cohort study, Confounding, Red meat, Lower risk, Risk factor, Physiology, Population, Environmental health, Internal medicine, Oncology, Confidence interval, Pathology
- MeSH
- humans, breast neoplasms, diet, risk factors, cohort studies, prospective studies, postmenopause, dairy products, eggs, meat products, aged, female
7 autores
- Larissa Marcondes🇳🇱Erasmus MC; Erasmus University Rotterdam
- Oscar H. Franco🇳🇱Erasmus MC; Erasmus University Rotterdam
- Rikje Ruiter🇳🇱Erasmus MC; Erasmus University Rotterdam
- M. Arfan Ikram🇳🇱Erasmus MC; Erasmus University Rotterdam
- Marlies Mulder🇳🇱Erasmus MC; Erasmus University Rotterdam
- Bruno H. Ch. Stricker🇳🇱Erasmus MC; Erasmus University Rotterdam
- Jessica C. Kiefte–de Jong🇳🇱 · autor de correspondenciaLeiden University; Leiden University Medical Center; Erasmus MC; Erasmus University Rotterdam
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
The role of diet on breast cancer risk is not well elucidated but animal food sources may play a role through, for example, the pathway of the insulin-like growth factor 1 system or cholesterol metabolism. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between animal foods and the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. This study was embedded in the Rotterdam Study, a population-based prospective cohort study of subjects aged 55 years and over (61 % female). Dietary intake of different animal foods was assessed at baseline using a validated FFQ and adjusted for energy intake using the residual method. We performed Cox proportional hazards modelling to analyse the association between the intake of the different food sources and breast cancer risk after adjustment for socio-demographic, lifestyle and metabolic factors. During a median follow-up of 17 years, we identified 199 cases of breast cancer (6·2 %) among 3209 women. After adjustment for multiple confounders, no consistent association was found between the intake of red meat intake, poultry, fish or dairy products and breast cancer risk. However, we found that egg intake was significantly associated with a higher risk of breast cancer (hazard ratioQ4 v. Q1: 1·83; 95 % CI 1·20, 2·79; Ptrend=0·01). In conclusion, this study found that dietary egg intake but no other animal foods was associated with a higher risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. Further research on the potential mechanisms underlying this association is warranted.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.