Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio2019Financiado por la industriaVínculos de autores con la industriaAcceso abierto

Incidence, Mechanisms, and Severity of Game-Related High School Football Injuries Across Artificial Turf Systems of Various Infill Weights

Meyers MC

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 12 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Vínculos de autores con la industriaFinanciado por la industria

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio de cohortes (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiado por la industria
Autores
Al menos un autor declara un vínculo económico con la industria

Según la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2014-07-01 · Orthop J Sports Med · vol. 2 · número 7_suppl2 · pág. 2325967119832878
Editorial
SAGE Publishing
Citado
5 citas · más que el 11% de estudios similares · 0.0× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
44 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY-NC-ND
Áreas de investigación
Sports injuries and prevention · Traumatic Brain Injury Research · Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
Palabras clave
Infill, Medicine, Incidence (geometry), Football, Poison control, Surgery, Structural engineering, Engineering, Mathematics, Geography, Archaeology, Emergency medicine, Geometry

1 autor

  • Michael C. Meyers🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaIdaho State University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Artificial turf surfaces are developed to duplicate playing characteristics of natural grass. With the newer generations of sand and rubber infill systems, the infill is a common component that varies between fields and is a critical factor that could influence the player-surface interaction. Because the influence of infill weight on sport trauma is unknown, this study quantified football trauma in high schools in the United States across artificial turf systems of various infill weights.

Hypothesis

Athletes would not experience differences in game-related injuries across artificial turf systems of various infill weights.

Study design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods

Artificial turf systems were divided into 4 sand/rubber infill weight groups by pounds per square foot: ≥9.0, 6.0-8.9, 3.0-5.9, and 0.0-2.9. A total of 57 high schools in 4 states participated over the course of 5 seasons. Outcomes of interest included injury severity, as a function of infill weight, across head, knee, and shoulder traumas; injury category; primary type of injury; tissue type; specific body location of injury; cleat design; environmental factors; and turf age. Data were subject to multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVAs) and Wilks λ criteria through use of general linear model procedures.

Results

Of 1837 games documented, 528 games were played on infill weights of ≥9.0 lb/ft2, 521 on 6.0-8.9 lb/ft2, 525 on 3.0-5.9 lb/ft2, and 263 on 0.0-2.9 lb/ft2, with 4655 total injuries reported. MANOVAs indicated significant infill weight effects across injury severity (F 2,4648 = 5.087; P = .0001), with significant main effects also observed by injury category, tissue injured, lower extremity joint and muscle, cleat design, environmental factors, and turf age. Post hoc analyses indicated significantly lower (P 2 infill weight systems compared with the lighter infill weight systems.

Conclusion

As infill surface weight decreased, football trauma significantly increased across numerous playing conditions. Based on findings, high school football fields should minimally contain 6.0 pounds of infill per square foot.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY-NC-ND).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.