Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio2019Acceso abierto

Creatine Supplementation Improves Phosphagen Energy Pathway During Supramaximal Effort, but Does Not Improve Anaerobic Capacity or Performance

de Poli RAB, Roncada LH, Malta ES, Artioli GG, Bertuzzi R, Zagatto AM

Frontiers in physiology · 14 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo clínico controlado (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Gobierno
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Subvenciones
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2017/21724‐8); Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior ((Code 001)); Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2016/17836-2)

Según 2 financiadores declarados y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2019-04-10 · Front Physiol · vol. 10 · pág. 352
Editorial
Frontiers Media
Citado
22 citas · más que el 75% de estudios similares · 1.3× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
41 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Muscle metabolism and nutrition · Sports Performance and Training · Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Palabras clave
Anaerobic exercise, Creatine, Biology, Medicine, Internal medicine, Physical therapy

6 autores

  • Rodrigo Araújo Bonetti de Poli🇧🇷Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
  • Luan Henrique Roncada🇧🇷Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
  • Elvis de Souza Malta🇧🇷Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
  • Guilherme Giannini Artioli🇧🇷Universidade de São Paulo
  • Rômulo Bertuzzi🇧🇷Universidade de São Paulo
  • Alessandro Moura Zagatto🇧🇷 · autor de correspondenciaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

This study aimed to investigate the effects of short-duration creatine monohydrate supplementation on anaerobic capacity (AC), anaerobic energy pathways, and time-to-exhaustion during high-intensity running. Fourteen healthy men underwent a graded exercise test (GXT) followed by a O2max confirmation test, 5 submaximal efforts, and 4 supramaximal running bouts at 115% of V ˙ O2max intensity (the first two supramaximal sessions were applied as familiarization trials) to measure the AC using two procedures; the maximum accumulated oxygen deficit (MAOD) and non-oxidative pathways energetics sum (AC[La-]+EPOCfast). The investigation was conducted in a single-blind and placebo-controlled manner, with participants performing the efforts first after being supplemented with a placebo (dextrose 20 g⋅day-1 for 5 days), and then, after a 7 day "placebo" washout period, they started the same procedure under creatine supplementation (20 g⋅day-1 for 5 days. This order was chosen due to the prolonged washout of creatine. MAOD was not different between placebo (3.35 ± 0.65 L) and creatine conditions (3.39 ± 0.79 L; P = 0.58) and presented a negligible effect [effect size (ES) = 0.08], similar to, AC[La-]+EPOCfast (placebo condition (3.66 ± 0.79 Land under creatine ingestion 3.82 ± 0.85 L; P = 0.07) presenting a small effect (ES = 0.20). The energetics from the phosphagen pathway increased significantly after creatine supplementation (1.66 ± 0.40 L) compared to the placebo condition (1.55 ± 0.42 L; P = 0.03). However, the glycolytic and oxidative pathways were not different between conditions. Furthermore, time to exhaustion did not differ between placebo (160.79 ± 37.76 s) and creatine conditions (163.64 ± 38.72; P = 0.49). Therefore, we can conclude that creatine supplementation improves the phosphagen energy contribution, but with no statistical effect on AC or time to exhaustion in supramaximal running.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.