Financiado en parte por L'Oreal USA, Galderma, Symrise, L'Oréal
Sunscreen photoprotection and vitamin D status
Passeron T, Bouillon R, Callender V, Cestari T, Diepgen TL, Green AC, van der Pols JC, Bernard BA, Ly F, Bernerd F, Marrot L, Nielsen M, Verschoore M, Jablonski NG, Young AR
The British journal of dermatology · 118 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiado por la industriaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Ficha de expertos o del gobierno (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiado por la industria
- Empresa
- L'Oreal USA
- Empresa
- Galderma
- Empresa
- Symrise
- Empresa
- L'Oréal
Según 4 financiadores declarados.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2019-05-09 · Br J Dermatol · vol. 181 · número 5 · págs. 916–931
- Editorial
- Oxford University Press
- Citado
- 202 citas · más que el 100% de estudios similares · 18.0× el promedio de su campo
- Impacto
- Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
- Referencias
- 112 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY
- Áreas de investigación
- Skin Protection and Aging · Vitamin D Research Studies · Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
- Palabras clave
- Photoprotection, Sun exposure, Vitamin D and neurology, Vitamin, Sunlight, Medicine, Dermatology, Environmental health, Chemistry, Physics, Internal medicine, Optics, Biochemistry
- MeSH
- skin, humans, skin neoplasms, vitamin d deficiency, vitamin d, sunscreening agents, mass screening, consensus, evidence-based medicine, sunlight, ultraviolet rays, reference values, recreation, sun protection factor, global health
15 autores
- Thierry Passeron🇫🇷Inserm; Université Côte d'Azur; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
- Roger Bouillon🇧🇪KU Leuven
- Valerie Dawn Callender
- Tânia Ferreira Cestari🇧🇷Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
- Thomas Ludwig Diepgen🇩🇪Heidelberg University
- Adèle C. Green🇦🇺🇬🇧🇨🇦QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre; Health Sciences Centre; University of Manchester
- Jolieke C. van der Pols
- Bruno Alain Bernard🇫🇷L'Oréal (France)
- Fatimata Ly🇸🇳Cheikh Anta Diop University
- Françoise Bernerd🇫🇷L'Oréal (France)
- Laurent Marrot🇫🇷L'Oréal (France)
- Mia N. Nielsen🇫🇷L'Oréal (France)
- Michèle Verschoore🇫🇷L'Oréal (France)
- Nina G. Jablonski🇺🇸Pennsylvania State University
- Antony Richard Young🇬🇧 · autor de correspondenciaKing's College London
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Background
Global concern about vitamin D deficiency has fuelled debates on photoprotection and the importance of solar exposure to meet vitamin D requirements.
Objectives
To review the published evidence to reach a consensus on the influence of photoprotection by sunscreens on vitamin D status, considering other relevant factors.
Methods
An international panel of 13 experts in endocrinology, dermatology, photobiology, epidemiology and biological anthropology reviewed the literature prior to a 1-day meeting in June 2017, during which the evidence was discussed. Methods of assessment and determining factors of vitamin D status, and public health perspectives were examined and consequences of sun exposure and the effects of photoprotection were assessed.
Results
A serum level of ≥ 50 nmol L-1 25(OH)D is a target for all individuals. Broad-spectrum sunscreens that prevent erythema are unlikely to compromise vitamin D status in healthy populations. Vitamin D screening should be restricted to those at risk of hypovitaminosis, such as patients with photosensitivity disorders, who require rigorous photoprotection. Screening and supplementation are advised for this group.
Conclusions
Sunscreen use for daily and recreational photoprotection does not compromise vitamin D synthesis, even when applied under optimal conditions. What's already known about this topic? Knowledge of the relationship between solar exposure behaviour, sunscreen use and vitamin D is important for public health but there is confusion about optimal vitamin D status and the safest way to achieve this. Practical recommendations on the potential impact of daily and/or recreational sunscreens on vitamin D status are lacking for healthy people. What does this study add? Judicious use of daily broad-spectrum sunscreens with high ultraviolet (UV) A protection will not compromise vitamin D status in healthy people. However, photoprotection strategies for patients with photosensitivity disorders that include high sun-protection factor sunscreens with high UVA protection, along with protective clothing and shade-seeking behaviour are likely to compromise vitamin D status. Screening for vitamin D status and supplementation are recommended in patients with photosensitivity disorders.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY-NC).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.