Moderate Consumption of Red Meat, Compared to Soy or Non-Soy Legume, Has No Adverse Effect on Cardio-Metabolic Factors in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
Hassanzadeh-Rostami Z, Hemmatdar Z, Pishdad GR, Faghih S
Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association · 19 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Alimentación controladaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
- Consumo medido con
- Comida provista por los investigadores
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
- Universidad u hospital
- Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
Según 1 financiador declarado.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2019-06-17 · Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes · vol. 129 · número 06 · págs. 429–437
- Editorial
- Thieme Medical Publishers (Germany)
- Citado
- 22 citas · más que el 79% de estudios similares · 1.3× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 48 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Phytoestrogen effects and research · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Diet and metabolism studies
- Palabras clave
- Medicine, Glycated hemoglobin, Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index, Diabetes mellitus, Legume, Blood pressure, Red meat, Internal medicine, Soy protein, Type 2 diabetes, Endocrinology, Insulin resistance, Biology, Insulin sensitivity, Agronomy
- MeSH
- humans, fabaceae, diabetes mellitus, type 2, diet, severity of illness index, risk factors, feeding behavior, body composition, adult, aged, middle aged, female, male, red meat, glycine max
4 autores
- Zahra Hassanzadeh-Rostami🇮🇷Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
- Zeinab Hemmatdar🇮🇷Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
- Gholam Reza Pishdad🇮🇷Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
- Shiva Faghih🇮🇷 · autor de correspondenciaShiraz University of Medical Sciences
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Background
Recently, it has been proposed that red meat consumption could enhance risk of diabetes and worsen lipid profile and glycemic status, in comparison with soy or non-soy legume, but the results of clinical trials are controversial.
Objectives
This study aimed to compare the effect of red meat, soy bean, and non-soy legume consumption on cardio-metabolic factors in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Methods
This was a randomized controlled clinical trial which included 75 patients with diabetes, aged 40-65 years. Participants were randomly allocated to receive two servings of red meat (control group), soy bean, or non-soy legume, 3 days a week for 8 weeks. All groups also received a balanced-macronutrients weight maintenance diet. Body composition and cardio-metabolic factors including fasting blood glucose (FBG), fasting insulin, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), serum lipids, and blood pressure were measured at baseline and endpoint of the study. Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) score and Framingham risk score (FRS) were also computed.
Results
We found no significant differences in changes of FBG, fasting insulin, HbA1c, QUICKI score, serum lipids, FRS, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure among the 3 groups. Within group analysis showed that FRS reduced significantly in all groups (P<0.05). In addition, systolic (P=0.01) and diastolic (P=0.03) blood pressure reduced within red meat group.
Conclusions
Compared to soy bean or non-soy legume, moderate consumption of red meat had no adverse effect on cardio-metabolic factors including FBG, fasting insulin, HbA1C, QUICKI score, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein , high-density lipoprotein , and blood pressure in adults with type 2 diabetes.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.