Almond Consumption and Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Lee-Bravatti MA, Wang J, Avendano EE, King L, Johnson EJ, Raman G
Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 55 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
- Consumo medido con
- No se indica
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2019-03-29 · Adv Nutr · vol. 10 · número 6 · págs. 1076–1088
- Editorial
- Elsevier BV
- Citado
- 78 citas · más que el 82% de estudios similares · 1.7× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 52 trabajos
- Acceso
- Lectura gratuita
- Áreas de investigación
- Nuts composition and effects · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Fatty Acid Research and Health
- Palabras clave
- almond consumption, cardiovascular risk factors, LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, body weight, serum lipids, triglycerides, blood pressure, C-reactive protein, apolipoprotein A-I, lipoprotein(a), fasting blood glucose, nut intake
- MeSH
- humans, nuts, cardiovascular diseases, body weight, lipids, apolipoproteins b, diet, medline, adult, female, male, randomized controlled trials as topic, biomarkers, prunus dulcis
6 autores
- Michelle Lee-Bravatti🇺🇸Tufts University
- Jifan Wang🇺🇸Tufts University
- Esther E Avendano🇺🇸Tufts Medical Center
- Ligaya King🇺🇸Tufts University
- Elizabeth J. Johnson🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaTufts University; Jean Mayer Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging
- Gowri Raman🇺🇸Tufts Medical Center
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Evidence suggests that eating nuts may reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating almond consumption and risk factors for CVD. MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau, and previous systematic reviews were searched from 1990 through June 2017 for RCTs of ≥3 wk duration that evaluated almond compared with no almond consumption in adults who were either healthy or at risk for CVD. The most appropriate stratum was selected with an almond dose closer to 42.5 g, with a control most closely matched for macronutrient composition, energy intake, and similar intervention duration. The outcomes included risk factors for CVD. Random-effects model meta-analyses and subgroup meta-analyses were performed. Fifteen eligible trials analyzed a total of 534 subjects. Almond intervention significantly decreased total cholesterol (summary net change: -10.69 mg/dL; 95% CI: -16.75, -4.63 mg/dL), LDL cholesterol (summary net change: -5.83 mg/dL; 95% CI: -9.91, -1.75 mg/dL); body weight (summary net change: -1.39 kg; 95% CI: -2.49, -0.30 kg), HDL cholesterol (summary net change: -1.26 mg/dL; 95% CI: -2.47, -0.05 mg/dL), and apolipoprotein B (apoB) (summary net change: -6.67 mg/dL; 95% CI: -12.63, -0.72 mg/dL). Triglycerides, systolic blood pressure, apolipoprotein A1, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and lipoprotein (a) showed no difference between almond and control in the main and subgroup analyses. Fasting blood glucose, diastolic blood pressure, and body mass index significantly decreased with almond consumption of >42.5 g compared with ≤42.5 g. Almond consumption may reduce the risk of CVD by improving blood lipids and by decreasing body weight and apoB. Substantial heterogeneity in eligible studies regarding almond interventions and dosages precludes firmer conclusions.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.