Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio de casos y controles2020Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumoSin ajuste declarado por estilo de vida

Consumption of meat, traditional and modern processed meat and colorectal cancer risk among the Moroccan population: A large-scale case-control study

S Deoula M, El Kinany K, Huybrechts I, Gunter MJ, Hatime Z, Boudouaya HA, Benslimane A, Nejjari C, El Abkari M, Badre W, El Feydi AE, Afkir S, Abda N, El Rhazi K

International journal of cancer · 28 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumoSin ajuste declarado por estilo de vida

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio de casos y controles (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Consumo medido con
Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumo

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
World Health Organization

Según 1 financiador declarado.

Publicación

Publicado
2019-09-16 · Int J Cancer · vol. 146 · número 5 · págs. 1333–1345
Editorial
Wiley
Citado
46 citas · más que el 96% de estudios similares · 5.6× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
41 trabajos
Acceso
Lectura gratuita
Áreas de investigación
Nutritional Studies and Diet · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Palabras clave
Red meat, Medicine, Colorectal cancer, Odds ratio, Confounding, White meat, Logistic regression, Case-control study, Confidence interval, Cancer, Internal medicine, Population, Processed meat, Environmental health, Food science, Pathology, Biology
MeSH
animals, poultry, humans, colorectal neoplasms, logistic models, risk, case-control studies, meat, meat products, rural population, urban population, morocco, female, male, red meat

14 autores

  • Meimouna S. Deoula🇲🇦 · autor de correspondenciaSidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University
  • Khaoula El Kinany🇲🇦Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University
  • Inge Huybrechts🇫🇷Centre international de recherche sur le cancer
  • Marc James Gunter🇫🇷Centre international de recherche sur le cancer
  • Zineb Hatime🇲🇦Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University
  • Hanae Abir Boudouaya🇲🇦Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University
  • Abdelilah Benslimane🇲🇦Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University
  • Chakib Nejjari🇲🇦Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University
  • Mohammed El Abkari🇲🇦Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hassan II
  • Wafaa Badre🇲🇦Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ibn Rochd
  • Abdellah Essaid El Feydi🇲🇦🇰🇼Hôpital Ibn Sina-Rabat; Ibn Sina Hospital
  • Saîd Afkir🇲🇦Mohamed I University
  • Naïma Abda🇲🇦Mohamed I University
  • Karima El Rhazi🇲🇦Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

The current study aimed to investigate the relationship between red and white meat subtypes, processed meat (divided into traditional "Khlii, Kaddid" and industrially processed meat) and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, considering CRC subsites, in Moroccan adults. A case-control study was conducted including 2,906 matched case-control pairs recruited from the five largest university hospitals in Morocco. Dietary data were collected through a validated Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ). Multivariable odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), for the association of CRC risk with meat consumption (high vs. low intake), were estimated using conditional logistic regression models, adjusted for relevant confounding variables. Overall, consumption of red meat was positively associated with colon cancer and CRC risk (OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.05-1.44; OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.02-1.27), respectively. In contrast, no significant association was observed between the consumption of red meat and rectal cancer risk (OR = 1.05, 95% = 0.90-1.23). Interestingly, while processed meat from industrial processes was positively associated with colon cancer, rectal cancer and CRC (OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.27-2.04; OR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.34-2.23; OR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.41-1.98), processed meat prepared using traditional methods was inversely associated with colon cancer and CRC risk (OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.57-0.98; OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.64-0.93), respectively. Furthermore, positive associations were observed between poultry intake and colon cancer risk among men (OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.01-1.59). Our study showed similar associations between the consumption of red meat and CRC risk in Morocco as in developed countries, while inverse associations were found for traditionally processed meat products. This is the first study to investigate the differential effects of traditional vs. westernized processed meat products in a developing country. Other studies are needed to confirm these findings and to understand the physiological pathways underlying these associations.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.