Unprocessed Red Meat and Processed Meat Consumption: Dietary Guideline Recommendations From the Nutritional Recommendations (NutriRECS) Consortium
Johnston BC, Zeraatkar D, Han MA, Vernooij RWM, Valli C, El Dib R, Marshall C, Stover PJ, Fairweather-Taitt S, Wójcik G, Bhatia F, de Souza R, Brotons C, Meerpohl JJ, Patel CJ, Djulbegovic B, Alonso-Coello P, Bala MM, Guyatt GH
Annals of internal medicine · 185 citas
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
- Consumo medido con
- No se indica
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
- Gobierno
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
- Gobierno
- NIEHS NIH HHS
- Subvenciones
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R00 ES023504)
Según 2 financiadores declarados.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2019-10-01 · Ann Intern Med · vol. 171 · número 10 · págs. 756–764
- Editorial
- American College of Physicians
- Citado
- 324 citas · más que el 100% de estudios similares · 33.2× el promedio de su campo
- Impacto
- Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
- Referencias
- 41 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (copia en repositorio)
- Áreas de investigación
- Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Palabras clave
- Medicine, Red meat, Guideline, Processed meat, Food science, White meat, Consumption (sociology), Environmental health, Pathology
- MeSH
- humans, neoplasms, cardiovascular diseases, diet, nutrition policy, meat products, red meat
19 autores
- Bradley C. Johnston🇨🇦🇺🇸Dalhousie University; Texas A&M University; McMaster University
- Dena Zeraatkar🇨🇦McMaster University
- Mi Ah Han🇰🇷Chosun University
- Robin W.M. Vernooij🇨🇦🇳🇱Dalhousie University; Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation
- Claudia Valli🇺🇸🇪🇸Biomedical Research Institute; Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre
- Regina El Dib🇨🇦🇧🇷Dalhousie University; Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
- Catherine Handy Marshall
- Patrick J. Stover🇺🇸Texas A&M University
- Susan Jane Fairweather‐Tait🇬🇧University of East Anglia
- Grzegorz Wójcik🇵🇱Jagiellonian University
- Faiz Bhatia
- Russell J. de Souza🇨🇦Population Health Research Institute
- Carlos Brotons
- Joerg J Meerpohl🇩🇪University of Freiburg
- Chirag J. Patel🇺🇸Harvard University
- Benjamin Djulbegović🇺🇸City of Hope
- Pablo Alonso‐Coello🇺🇸🇪🇸Biomedical Research Institute; Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre
- Małgorzata Maria Bała🇵🇱Jagiellonian University
- Gordon Henry Guyatt🇨🇦McMaster University
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
This article has been corrected. The original version (PDF) is appended to this article as a Supplement.
Description
Dietary guideline recommendations require consideration of the certainty in the evidence, the magnitude of potential benefits and harms, and explicit consideration of people's values and preferences. A set of recommendations on red meat and processed meat consumption was developed on the basis of 5 de novo systematic reviews that considered all of these issues.
Methods
The recommendations were developed by using the Nutritional Recommendations (NutriRECS) guideline development process, which includes rigorous systematic review methodology, and GRADE methods to rate the certainty of evidence for each outcome and to move from evidence to recommendations. A panel of 14 members, including 3 community members, from 7 countries voted on the final recommendations. Strict criteria limited the conflicts of interest among panel members. Considerations of environmental impact or animal welfare did not bear on the recommendations. Four systematic reviews addressed the health effects associated with red meat and processed meat consumption, and 1 systematic review addressed people's health-related values and preferences regarding meat consumption.
Recommendations
The panel suggests that adults continue current unprocessed red meat consumption (weak recommendation, low-certainty evidence). Similarly, the panel suggests adults continue current processed meat consumption (weak recommendation, low-certainty evidence).
Primary funding source
None. (PROSPERO 2017: CRD42017074074; PROSPERO 2018: CRD42018088854).
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.