Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Revisión sistemática2019Financiación no declaradaMezcla carne procesada con no procesada

Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials

Zeraatkar D, Johnston BC, Bartoszko J, Cheung K, Bala MM, Valli C, Rabassa M, Sit D, Milio K, Sadeghirad B, Agarwal A, Zea AM, Lee Y, Han MA, Vernooij RWM, Alonso-Coello P, Guyatt GH, El Dib R

Annals of internal medicine · 80 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declaradaMezcla carne procesada con no procesada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Consumo medido con
No se indica

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2019-10-01 · Ann Intern Med · vol. 171 · número 10 · págs. 721–731
Editorial
American College of Physicians
Citado
133 citas · más que el 100% de estudios similares · 17.4× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
68 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (copia en repositorio) · CC-BY-NC-ND
Áreas de investigación
Nutritional Studies and Diet · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Meat and Animal Product Quality
Palabras clave
Medicine, Cancer, Red meat, Internal medicine, Food science, Environmental health, Pathology
MeSH
humans, neoplasms, cardiovascular diseases, diet, randomized controlled trials as topic, red meat

18 autores

  • Dena Zeraatkar🇨🇦McMaster University
  • Bradley C. Johnston🇨🇦McMaster University
  • Jessica Julia Bartoszko🇨🇦McMaster University
  • Kevin J. Cheung🇨🇦McMaster University
  • Małgorzata Maria Bała🇵🇱Jagiellonian University
  • Claudia Valli🇺🇸🇪🇸Biomedical Research Institute; Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre
  • Montserrat Rabassa🇺🇸🇪🇸Biomedical Research Institute; Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre
  • Daegan Sit🇨🇦University of British Columbia
  • Kirolos Milio🇨🇦McMaster University
  • Behnam Sadeghirad🇨🇦McMaster University
  • Arnav Agarwal🇨🇦University of Toronto
  • Adriana M. Zea🇨🇦McMaster University
  • Yung Lee🇨🇦McMaster University
  • Mi Ah Han🇰🇷Chosun University
  • Robin W.M. Vernooij🇳🇱Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation
  • Pablo Alonso‐Coello🇺🇸🇪🇸Biomedical Research Institute; Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre
  • Gordon Henry Guyatt🇨🇦McMaster University
  • Regina El Dib🇧🇷Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

This article has been corrected. The original version (PDF) is appended to this article as a Supplement.

Background

Few randomized trials have evaluated the effect of reducing red meat intake on clinically important outcomes.

Purpose

To summarize the effect of lower versus higher red meat intake on the incidence of cardiometabolic and cancer outcomes in adults.

Data sources

EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Web of Science, and ProQuest from inception to July 2018 and MEDLINE from inception to April 2019, without language restrictions.

Study selection

Randomized trials (published in any language) comparing diets lower in red meat with diets higher in red meat that differed by a gradient of at least 1 serving per week for 6 months or more.

Data extraction

Teams of 2 reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence.

Data synthesis

Of 12 eligible trials, a single trial enrolling 48 835 women provided the most credible, though still low-certainty, evidence that diets lower in red meat may have little or no effect on all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.99 [95% CI, 0.95 to 1.03]), cardiovascular mortality (HR, 0.98 [CI, 0.91 to 1.06]), and cardiovascular disease (HR, 0.99 [CI, 0.94 to 1.05]). That trial also provided low- to very-low-certainty evidence that diets lower in red meat may have little or no effect on total cancer mortality (HR, 0.95 [CI, 0.89 to 1.01]) and the incidence of cancer, including colorectal cancer (HR, 1.04 [CI, 0.90 to 1.20]) and breast cancer (HR, 0.97 [0.90 to 1.04]).

Limitations

There were few trials, most addressing only surrogate outcomes, with heterogeneous comparators and small gradients in red meat consumption between lower versus higher intake groups.

Conclusion

Low- to very-low-certainty evidence suggests that diets restricted in red meat may have little or no effect on major cardiometabolic outcomes and cancer mortality and incidence.

Primary funding source

None (PROSPERO: CRD42017074074).

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.