A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Jia Z, Yang J, Qin H
Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 0 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
- Consumo medido con
- No se indica
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2019-09-20 · J Vis Exp · número 151
- Editorial
- MyJOVE
- Citado
- 0 citas · más que el 13% de estudios similares · 0.0× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 0 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology · Enhanced Recovery After Surgery · Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
- Palabras clave
- parenteral nutrition, olive oil, soybean oil, lipid emulsions, non-inferiority, serum prealbumin, postoperative nutrition, surgical patients, infection rate, oxidative stress, inflammatory markers
- MeSH
- humans, inflammation, soybean oil, parenteral nutrition, surgical procedures, operative, prospective studies, oxidative stress, adolescent, adult, aged, aged, 80 and over, middle aged, female, male, young adult, olive oil, asian people
3 autores
- Zhenyi Jia🇨🇳Shanghai Jiao Tong University; Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital
- Jun Yang🇨🇳Shanghai Jiao Tong University; Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital
- Huanlong Qin🇨🇳Tongji University; Shanghai Jiao Tong University; Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital; Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Limited evidence exists to precisely estimate efficacy and safety differences between parenteral nutrition (PN) prepared using olive-oil-based three-chamber bags (3CBs) and soybean-oil-based compounded bags (CoBs) in hospitalized adult patients. We designed a multicenter, randomized, prospective, open-label, noninferiority protocol to compare the efficacy, safety, and distribution of olive-oil-based 3CBs and soybean-oil-based CoB formulations in adult Chinese patients requiring PN during surgical intervention. Subjects were randomized to receive either one of the study treatments using an interactive voice or web-based recognition system in accordance with the randomization code. Randomization was further stratified based on the study site and surgical category. Both treatment groups received similar amounts of calories and protein. In addition, the two study treatments contained a similar composition of the amino-acid component. The only difference between the two PN formulations was the lipid constitution. The duration of administration of study treatments was a minimum of 5 days up to a maximum of 14 days after the surgical procedure. The primary efficacy endpoint was serum prealbumin levels on day 5 of the study. Noninferiority was proved if the anti-log of the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the treatment difference was at least 0.80. Other efficacy measures included treatment preparation time; duration to achieve tolerability of oral nutrition; associated infectious complications; length of hospitalization; and laboratory assessment of markers of nutrition, inflammation, metabolism, and oxidative stress. A total of 458 patients were enrolled in the study. The results showed that olive-oil-based 3CBs were non-inferior to soybean-based CoBs, besides being well tolerated. The infection rate was found to be significantly lower in the olive-oil-based 3CB group. Thus, this study may be used as a reference for future research on lipid emulsion and 3CBs.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.