Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio2019Acceso abierto

Multiple health and environmental impacts of foods

Clark MA, Springmann M, Hill J, Tilman D

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 397 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Consumo medido con
No se indica

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Gobierno
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Universidad u hospital
University of Minnesota
Organización sin fines de lucro
Wellcome Trust
Subvenciones
U.S. Department of Agriculture (MN-12-083); Wellcome Trust (205212); U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (R835873); Wellcome Trust (205212/Z/16/Z)

Según 4 financiadores declarados y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2019-10-28 · Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A · vol. 116 · número 46 · págs. 23357–23362
Editorial
National Academy of Sciences
Citado
885 citas · más que el 100% de estudios similares · 53.6× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
53 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Palabras clave
Environmental degradation, Sustainability, Environmental health, Sustainable development, Environmental planning, Climate change, Environmental resource management, Business, Geography, Natural resource economics, Environmental science, Medicine, Economics, Ecology, Biology
MeSH
humans, chronic disease, diet, mortality, conservation of natural resources, food

4 autores

  • Michael Clark🇺🇸🇬🇧University of Minnesota; Minnesota Department of Natural Resources; University of Oxford
  • Marco Springmann🇬🇧University of Oxford
  • Jason Hill🇺🇸University of Minnesota
  • David Tilman🇺🇸University of Minnesota; University of California, Santa Barbara

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Food choices are shifting globally in ways that are negatively affecting both human health and the environment. Here we consider how consuming an additional serving per day of each of 15 foods is associated with 5 health outcomes in adults and 5 aspects of agriculturally driven environmental degradation. We find that while there is substantial variation in the health outcomes of different foods, foods associated with a larger reduction in disease risk for one health outcome are often associated with larger reductions in disease risk for other health outcomes. Likewise, foods with lower impacts on one metric of environmental harm tend to have lower impacts on others. Additionally, of the foods associated with improved health (whole grain cereals, fruits, vegetables, legumes, nuts, olive oil, and fish), all except fish have among the lowest environmental impacts, and fish has markedly lower impacts than red meats and processed meats. Foods associated with the largest negative environmental impacts-unprocessed and processed red meat-are consistently associated with the largest increases in disease risk. Thus, dietary transitions toward greater consumption of healthier foods would generally improve environmental sustainability, although processed foods high in sugars harm health but can have relatively low environmental impacts. These findings could help consumers, policy makers, and food companies to better understand the multiple health and environmental implications of food choices.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.