Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio2019Solo mecanismosAcceso abierto

Caffeine May Abrogate LPS-Induced Oxidative Stress and Neuroinflammation by Regulating Nrf2/TLR4 in Adult Mouse Brains

Badshah H, Ikram M, Ali W, Ahmad S, Hahm JR, Kim MO

Biomolecules · 86 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Solo mecanismos

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio en animales (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
Estudiado en
Animales
Resultado principal
Solo mecanismos

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente

Según la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2019-11-08 · Biomolecules · vol. 9 · número 11 · pág. 719
Editorial
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Citado
103 citas · más que el 96% de estudios similares · 4.9× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
41 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms · Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress · Tryptophan and brain disorders
Palabras clave
Oxidative stress, Caffeine, Lipopolysaccharide, TLR4, Endocrinology, Neuroinflammation, Chemistry, Internal medicine, Lipid peroxidation, Reactive oxygen species, Apoptosis, Pharmacology, Receptor, Biology, Medicine, Inflammation, Biochemistry
MeSH
brain, nerve tissue, animals, humans, mice, inflammation, reactive oxygen species, caffeine, jnk mitogen-activated protein kinases, lipopolysaccharides, nf-kappa b, membrane proteins, antioxidants, apoptosis, gene expression regulation, lipid peroxidation, oxidative stress, toll-like receptor 4, nf-e2-related factor 2, heme oxygenase-1

6 autores

  • Haroon Badshah🇰🇷Gyeongsang National University
  • Muhammad Aimen Ikram🇰🇷Gyeongsang National University
  • Waqar Ali🇰🇷Gyeongsang National University
  • Sareer Ahmad🇰🇷Gyeongsang National University
  • Jong Ryeal Hahm🇰🇷Gyeongsang National University Hospital
  • Myeong Ok Kim🇰🇷 · autor de correspondenciaGyeongsang National University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Herein, we assayed the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory potential of caffeine in a lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-injected mouse model of neurodegeneration and synaptic impairment. For this purpose, LPS was injected for two weeks on an alternate-day basis (250 µg/kg/i.p. for a total of seven doses), while caffeine was injected daily for four weeks (30 mg/kg/i.p/four weeks). According to our findings, there was a significant increase in the level of reactive oxygen species (ROS), as evaluated from the levels of lipid peroxidation (LPO) and ROS assays. Also, we evaluated the expression of nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) and the enzyme hemeoxygenase 1 (HO-1) in the mouse groups and found reduced expression of Nrf2 and HO-1 in the LPS-treated mice brains, but they were markedly upregulated in the LPS + caffeine co-treated group. We also noted enhanced expression of toll-Like Receptor 4 (TLR4), phospho-nuclear factor kappa B (p-NF-kB), and phospho-c-Jun n-terminal kinase (p-JNK) in the LPS-treated mice brains, which was significantly reduced in the LPS + caffeine co-treated group. Moreover, we found enhanced expression of Bcl2-associated X, apoptosis regulator (Bax), and cleaved caspase-3, and reduced expression of B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) in the LPS-treated group, which were markedly reversed in the LPS + caffeine co-treated group. Furthermore, we analyzed the expression of synaptic proteins in the treated groups and found a marked reduction in the expression of synaptic markers in the LPS-treated group; these were significantly upregulated in the LPS + caffeine co-treated group. In summary, we conclude that caffeine may inhibit LPS-induced oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and synaptic dysfunction.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.