Vocal Music Therapy for Chronic Pain: A Mixed Methods Feasibility Study
Low MY, Lacson C, Zhang F, Kesslick A, Bradt J
Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) · 20 citas
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
- Gobierno
- National Endowment for the Arts
Según 1 financiador declarado y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2019-11-21 · J Altern Complement Med · vol. 26 · número 2 · págs. 113–122
- Editorial
- Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
- Citado
- 62 citas · más que el 96% de estudios similares · 5.7× el promedio de su campo
- Impacto
- Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
- Referencias
- 32 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY-NC
- Áreas de investigación
- Music Therapy and Health · Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation · Art Therapy and Mental Health
- Palabras clave
- chronic pain, pain management, feasibility, depression, anxiety, pain intensity, pain interference, social participation (health and rehabilitation), well-being, spiritual connection, medication adherence, Black women
- MeSH
- humans, treatment outcome, music therapy, feasibility studies, adult, middle aged, female, male, chronic pain
5 autores
- Ming Yuan Low🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaDrexel University
- Clarissa Jean Lacson🇺🇸Drexel University
- Fengqing Zhang🇺🇸Drexel University
- Amy Kesslick🇺🇸Drexel University
- Joke Bradt🇺🇸Drexel University
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and preliminary effects of a vocal music therapy (VMT) program on chronic pain management. Design: A mixed methods intervention design was used in which qualitative data were embedded within a randomized controlled trial. Setting: An urban nurse-management health center on the East Coast of the United States. Subjects: Participants (N = 43) were predominantly Black (79%) and female (76.7%) with an average pain duration of 10 years. Intervention: Participants were randomly allocated to a 12-week VMT program or a waitlist control. Outcome measures: We tracked consent rate (percentage of participants enrolled out of total number screened), attrition rate, and treatment adherence. We used PROMIS® (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) tools to measure pain interference, pain-related self-efficacy, pain intensity, depression, anxiety, positive effect, and well-being, ability to participate in social activities, and satisfaction with social roles at baseline and week 12. VMT participants also completed the Patient Global Impression of Change Scale. We conducted semistructured interviews to better understand participants' experience of the intervention. Results: The consent rate was 56%. The attrition rate was 23%. Large treatment effects (partial eta squared) were obtained for self-efficacy (0.20), depression (0.26), and ability to participate in social activities (0.24). Medium effects were found for pain intensity (0.10), anxiety (0.06), positive effect, and well-being (0.06), and small effects for pain interference (0.03) and satisfaction with social roles (0.03). On average, participants felt moderately better after completion of the VMT program (M = 4.93, standard deviation = 1.98). Qualitative findings suggest that VMT resulted in better self-management of pain, enhanced psychological well-being, and stronger social and spiritual connections. Conclusions: Recruitment into the 12-week program was challenging, but quantitative and qualitative findings suggest significant benefits of VMT for chronic pain management.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY-NC).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.