Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Revisión sistemática2019Financiación no declarada

Photobiomodulation in Oral Surgery: A Review

Hosseinpour S, Tunér J, Fekrazad R

Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery · 33 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2019-11-21 · Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg · vol. 37 · número 12 · págs. 814–825
Editorial
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
Citado
55 citas · más que el 94% de estudios similares · 3.7× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
73 trabajos
Acceso
Lectura gratuita
Áreas de investigación
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques · Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments
Palabras clave
Trismus, Medicine, Cochrane Library, Dentistry, Oral and maxillofacial surgery, Oral Surgical Procedures, MEDLINE, Clinical trial, Web of science, Randomized controlled trial, Surgery, Meta-analysis, Internal medicine
MeSH
humans, surgery, oral, low-level light therapy

3 autores

  • Sepanta Hosseinpour🇦🇺The University of Queensland
  • Jan Tunér
  • Reza Fekrazad🇮🇷 · autor de correspondenciaAja University of Medical Sciences; Universal Scientific Education and Research Network

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objective: This article presents a review of current data on the applications of photobiomodulation (PBM) in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS), to guide future research. Background data: Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) has been reported to be effective for various postoperative conditions, including pain relief, improvement of mastication, neurosensory recovery, and wound healing. There is a need for identifying the therapeutic irradiation windows for these conditions, based upon the available literature. Materials and methods: All original articles related to PBM for oral surgery in MEDLINE (NCBI PubMed and PMC), EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were reviewed until December 2018. Results: Forty-six clinical trials were included in this study. These trials were categorized into three different types of PBM applications. After reviewing all these studies, the most effective physical properties for PBM pain reduction after tooth extraction were as follows: wavelength 650-980 nm; power 4-300 mW; and energy density 3-85.7 J/cm2. PBMT at 660-910 nm with 4-500 mW power and 2-480 J/cm2 energy density was effective for decreasing facial swelling. At the same wavelength and power range with 4-106 J/cm2 energy density, PBM was effective for alleviating trismus after tooth extraction. Conclusions: Most papers suggested that PBM seemed to be effective in reducing pain, swelling, and trismus after third molar tooth extraction, neurosensory and nerve recovery after mandibular ramus osteotomy. The heterogeneity of the standardization regarding the parameters of laser calls for caution in interpretation of these results. However, this evidence-based review regarding the best protocols for OMFS applications can be beneficial for both future research and clinical applications.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.