Egg intervention effect on linear growth no longer present after two years
Iannotti LL, Chapnick M, Nicholas J, Gallegos-Riofrio CA, Moreno P, Douglas K, Habif D, Cui Y, Stewart C, Lutter CK, Waters WF
Maternal & child nutrition · 26 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Sin ajuste declarado por estilo de vidaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Estudio de cohortes (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
- Consumo medido con
- Diarios o recordatorios de alimentación
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Posiblemente financiado por la industria
- Universidad u hospital
- Washington University in St. Louis
- Empresa
- Mathile Institute for the Advancement of Human Nutrition
- Empresa
- The Mathile Institute for the Advancement of Human Nutrition
Según 3 financiadores declarados y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2019-12-17 · Matern Child Nutr · vol. 16 · número 2 · pág. e12925
- Editorial
- Wiley
- Citado
- 36 citas · más que el 91% de estudios similares · 3.0× el promedio de su campo
- Impacto
- Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
- Referencias
- 38 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY
- Áreas de investigación
- Child Nutrition and Water Access · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet · Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
- Palabras clave
- Medicine, Anthropometry, Demography, Cohort, Cohort study, Randomized controlled trial, Linear growth, Pediatrics, Surgery, Internal medicine
- MeSH
- humans, growth disorders, body weight, anthropometry, body height, diet, longitudinal studies, follow-up studies, child development, eggs, child, preschool, ecuador, female, male
11 autores
- Lora Lynn Iannotti🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaWashington University in St. Louis; Saint Louis University
- Melissa Chapnick🇺🇸Washington University in St. Louis; Saint Louis University
- Jennifer Lynn Nicholas🇺🇸Washington University in St. Louis; Mallinckrodt (United States)
- Carlos Andrés Gallegos-Riofrío🇺🇸🇪🇨Washington University in St. Louis; Saint Louis University; Universidad San Francisco de Quito
- Patricia I. Moreno🇪🇨Universidad San Francisco de Quito
- Katherine Douglas🇺🇸Washington University in St. Louis; Mallinckrodt (United States)
- David V. Habif🇺🇸Washington University in St. Louis; Saint Louis University
- Yuhan Cui🇺🇸Washington University in St. Louis; Saint Louis University
- Christine P. Stewart🇺🇸University of California, Davis
- Chessa K. Lutter🇺🇸RTI International; University of Maryland, College Park
- William F. Waters🇪🇨Universidad San Francisco de Quito
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
The Lulun Project, a randomized controlled trial conducted in 2015, found that one egg per day for 6 months during early complementary feeding reduced stunting by 47% and increased linear growth by 0.63 length-for-age Z (LAZ). This follow-up cohort study (Lulun Project II) aimed to test whether the growth effect remained in the egg intervention group compared with the control group after approximately 2 years. Mothers or caregivers from the Lulun Project were recontacted and recruited for this study. Enumerators collected data on socio-economic and demographic factors, 24-hr frequency of dietary intakes, morbidities, and anthropometric measures of height, weight, and head circumference using World Health Organization protocols. Statistical analyses followed the same analytical plan as Lulun Project, applying generalized linear models and regression modelling to test group differences in height-for-age z (HAZ) from LAZ at Lulun Project endline, and structural equation modelling for mediation. One hundred thirty-five mother-child dyads were included in Lulun II, with 11% losses to follow-up from endline Lulun Project. Growth faltering across all children was evident with HAZ -2.07 ± 0.91 and a stunting prevelance of 50%. Regression modelling showed no difference between egg and control groups for the HAZ outcome and other anthropometric outcomes, and significant declines in HAZ from endline Lulun Project in the egg intervention are compared with control groups. Current dietary egg intake, however, was associated with reduced growth faltering in HAZ from Lulun Project endline to Lulun Project II, independent of group assignment and through mediation, explaining 8.8% of the total effect. Findings suggest the need for a longer intervention period and ongoing nutrition support to young children during early childhood.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.