Circulating Ionized Magnesium: Comparisons with Circulating Total Magnesium and the Response to Magnesium Supplementation in a Randomized Controlled Trial
Rooney MR, Rudser KD, Alonso A, Harnack L, Saenger AK, Lutsey PL
Nutrients · 21 citas
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- American Heart Association
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- McKnight Foundation
- Gobierno
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
- Gobierno
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Gobierno
- NHLBI NIH HHS
- Gobierno
- NCATS NIH HHS
- Subvenciones
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL007779); American Heart Association (T32HL007779); National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences ((UL1-TR002494)); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K24 HL148521); American Heart Association (16EIA26410001)
Según 6 financiadores declarados y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2020-01-20 · Nutrients · vol. 12 · número 1 · pág. 263
- Editorial
- Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
- Citado
- 32 citas · más que el 89% de estudios similares · 2.5× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 19 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
- Áreas de investigación
- Magnesium in Health and Disease · Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments · Potassium and Related Disorders
- Palabras clave
- IMG, Magnesium, Placebo, Medicine, Population, Randomized controlled trial, Animal science, Internal medicine, Chemistry, Biology
- MeSH
- humans, magnesium oxide, administration, oral, pilot projects, double-blind method, nutritional status, time factors, dietary supplements, aged, middle aged, female, male
6 autores
- Mary R. Rooney🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Minnesota; Johns Hopkins University
- Kyle D. Rudser🇺🇸University of Minnesota
- Álvaro Alonso🇺🇸Emory University
- Lisa Harnack🇺🇸University of Minnesota
- Amy K. Saenger🇺🇸Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute
- Pamela L. Lutsey🇺🇸University of Minnesota
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Ionized Mg (iMg) is considered the biologically active fraction of circulating total Mg (tMg). It is possible that iMg may be a more physiologically relevant marker than tMg. Using data from a double-blind pilot randomized controlled trial, we tested (1) whether oral Mg supplementation will increase iMg concentrations compared with placebo and (2) the relationship between iMg and tMg at baseline. Additionally, we evaluated the agreement between iMg measured in fresh whole blood versus stored samples. A total of fifty-nine participants were randomized 1:1 to oral Mg supplementation (400 mg/day, Mg Oxide) or placebo for 10 weeks. Fasting blood samples were obtained at baseline and follow-up. The analysis used linear regression and an intent-to-treat approach. Participants were generally healthy, the mean age was 62, and 73% were female. The baseline iMg and tMg were modestly and positively associated (r = 0.50). The ratio of baseline iMg to tMg was 64%. The mean supplement effect on iMg was 0.03 mmol/L (95% CI:0.01, 0.05) for Mg supplementation versus placebo. The supplement effect on iMg was not statistically significantly different according to baseline iMg status (above/below median). Compared to fresh blood, iMg was consistently higher in refrigerated and frozen samples by 0.14 and 0.20 mmol/L, respectively. In this relatively healthy adult population, Mg supplementation over 10 weeks resulted in increased iMg concentrations. Whether iMg is a more appropriate measure of Mg status than tMg, and the public health or clinical utility of measuring iMg remains to be determined.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.